View source for Forum:I might have found a way to get the cheesy factor back (Proposal)

{{Forumheader|General Discussion}}

{{Forumcat|General Discussion}}
{{Forumpost
|text=So, we all know what happened to the '''Cheesy Factor''', right? (And if you don't, it got replaced in 2018 with the Editor's Note alongside the Scare Factor).

Well, many have wanted to get those back, but to no avail. However, I might have found a way to get the Cheesy Factor back, but in a more informative form.

Let me present to you.. '''Errors/Oversights.'''

Now, this sorta is the cheesy factor, as the factor meant that it was something in the logo that didn't age well. Well, this is sort of like it, but it can't (and shouldn't) be opinionated, as you need actual evidence of this happening.

Now, how can this be presented in the page? Let me show an example.

Let's say it's the '''Paramount''' logo from '''2002-2011.'''

'''Errors/Oversights:''' Earlier versions of the logo (mostly the 90th anniversary variant) has the clouds ending at the bottom right during the pan to the mountain, meaning they are a 2D texture pasted behind the logo.

You can try spotting this oversight by checking this [https://youtu.be/_srEX9V8tt8 capture].

Now, this is definitely optional, like not every logo has to have an error/oversight in it.

I think this is a neat little addition to the wiki that could be added, mainly because of the demand of the Cheesy Factor coming back, as well as that it is.. well.. more information to the wiki!

Anyways, what do you guys think? Leave your opinions down below. :)
|username=VPJHuk
|rank=User
|timestamp=16 October 2021
}}
{{Forumpost
|text=As I said, this would not work however.
|username=WindowsViennaFish2010
|rank=User
|timestamp=16 October 2021
}}
{{Forumpost
|text=I am supporting this.
|username=LogoFun13-YT
|rank=User
|timestamp=16 October 2021
}}
{{Forumpost
|text=Sounds like a nice idea.
|username=CLGW1K1R8CKS
|rank=User
|timestamp=16 October 2021
}}
{{Forumpost
|text=Ooh, I like this.
|username=AlmightyKingPrawn
|rank=User
|timestamp=16 October 2021
}}
{{Forumpost
|text=Looks fine to me.
|username=CooleyBoy10
|rank=Administrator
|timestamp=16 October 2021
}}
{{Forumpost
|text=I don't think so. Seems it still could be written in the Editor's Note.
|username=BlueMickey634
|rank=User
|timestamp=17 October 2021
}}
{{Forumpost
|text=Great idea, mate! Fantastinen!
|username=JontyMaster
|rank=User
|timestamp=17 October 2021
}}
{{Forumpost
|text=I have a feeling this could be exploited to basically being another Cheesy Factor...
|username=Solarstrike
|rank=User
|timestamp=17 October 2021
}}
{{Forumpost
|text=Good idea!
|username=CircleyverseFaneggdog
|rank=User
|timestamp=17 October 2021
}}
{{Forumpost
|text=Solarstrike is right. It would be simply a rebranded Cheesy Factor.
|username=BlueMickey634
|rank=User
|timestamp=17 October 2021
}}
{{Forumpost
|text=Per Solarstrike and BlueMickey.
|username=Logohub
|rank=Administrator
|timestamp=18 October 2021
}}
{{Forumpost
|text={{quote|''From VPJHuk (certain parts emphasized):'' Now, this sorta is the cheesy factor, as the factor meant that it was something in the logo that didn't age well. Well, this is sort of like it, but it '''can't (and shouldn't) be opinionated''', as '''you need actual evidence of this happening'''.}}
This means that it won't be opinionated, as it shows what the various errors with the logos are.
|username=LogoFun13-YT
|rank=User
|timestamp=18 October 2021
}}
{{Forumpost
|text=VPJHuk, I want to start doing Errors/Oversights now! Supporting it also
|username=Timrek2007
|rank=User
|timestamp=24 November 2021
}}