Forum:I might have found a way to get the cheesy factor back (Proposal)
| Report post
|
So, we all know what happened to the Cheesy Factor, right? (And if you don't, it got replaced in 2018 with the Editor's Note alongside the Scare Factor). Well, many have wanted to get those back, but to no avail. However, I might have found a way to get the Cheesy Factor back, but in a more informative form. Let me present to you.. Errors/Oversights. Now, this sorta is the cheesy factor, as the factor meant that it was something in the logo that didn't age well. Well, this is sort of like it, but it can't (and shouldn't) be opinionated, as you need actual evidence of this happening. Now, how can this be presented in the page? Let me show an example. Let's say it's the Paramount logo from 2002-2011. Errors/Oversights: Earlier versions of the logo (mostly the 90th anniversary variant) has the clouds ending at the bottom right during the pan to the mountain, meaning they are a 2D texture pasted behind the logo. You can try spotting this oversight by checking this capture. Now, this is definitely optional, like not every logo has to have an error/oversight in it. I think this is a neat little addition to the wiki that could be added, mainly because of the demand of the Cheesy Factor coming back, as well as that it is.. well.. more information to the wiki! Anyways, what do you guys think? Leave your opinions down below. :) |
| Report post
|
As I said, this would not work however. |
| Report post
|
I am supporting this. |
| Report post
|
Sounds like a nice idea. |
| Report post
|
Ooh, I like this. |
| Report post
|
Looks fine to me. |
| Report post
|
I don't think so. Seems it still could be written in the Editor's Note. |
| Report post
|
Great idea, mate! Fantastinen! |
| Report post
|
I have a feeling this could be exploited to basically being another Cheesy Factor... |
| Report post
|
Good idea! |
| Report post
|
Solarstrike is right. It would be simply a rebranded Cheesy Factor. |
| Report post
|
Per Solarstrike and BlueMickey. |
| Report post
|
From VPJHuk (certain parts emphasized): Now, this sorta is the cheesy factor, as the factor meant that it was something in the logo that didn't age well. Well, this is sort of like it, but it can't (and shouldn't) be opinionated, as you need actual evidence of this happening. This means that it won't be opinionated, as it shows what the various errors with the logos are. |
| Report post
|
VPJHuk, I want to start doing Errors/Oversights now! Supporting it also |
