User talk:OllieE2b
Welcome!
-- WelcomeBot (talk) 17:41, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Multiple accounts notice
 | Hello, OllieE2b. You appear to have registered an additional account. Please note that our rules do permit alternate accounts, however you will need to disclose this fact to the administration staff. If this was the result of a glitch/mistake, losing your password to your original account, or if you wanted a different username, please respond below naming the account you wish to keep. The extra account will then be blocked. Additionally, in the event you lost access to your account or wanted a different username, we suggest trying the following actions before creating another account:
|
Reminder regarding edit warring
Hi, OllieE2b. It appears you are engaging in an edit war at Paramount Pictures. This is when users disagree over the content of an article and repeatedly revert each other's edits. This type of editing is disruptive and unproductive. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page before editing further. Thank You. Camenati (talk) 00:37, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- You appear to be edit warring again on the Nick Jr. On Demand article. Considering you have been previously blocked for the same issue, continuing to partake in edit warring will result in a lengthier ban than your previous one. And another note, we have retired tiers such as "Current" due to their subjectivity. Please keep that in mind next time. Camenati (talk) 01:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Regarding the end date of Paramount Pictures' 1986 logo
(reposted from the other account) Hello there! As you can see, we're in a bit of pickle regarding the end date of the 1986 Paramount Pictures logo. I just want to know why you feel the 2003 home media releases of those Nickelodeon releases "count" as the full theatrical logo being kept in active circulation rather than a variant of the 1987 HV logo. (going as far as editing my notes to imply other things while conveniently leaving out context on the 2003 releases' inclusion) The main reason why I feel 2/15/02 is the end date rather than the 10/7/03 date is because we only count the mainline appearances of the theatrical logo (in most contexts), which ended at Crossroads - any further appearances (including the 2003 releases) were one-offs.
Happy to hear your reasoning on why you strongly feel the 2003 releases count as the end date though, and with enough evidence and reasoning, you might convince me to change my mind. And just out of curiosity, I am curious if you read my edit summaries. Solarstrike (talk) 06:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Strong warning regarding edit warring
Hello, OllieE2b. It appears you are continuing to edit war on the Paramount Pictures page by reverting another user's changes yet again. Because you will not cooperate with Solarstrike and continue to disregard administrative warnings on the matter, I am giving you a strong warning on the issue and I strongly implore you to stop edit warring as well as read the site rules and tutorial guide on understanding what is and not desired when making edits on the wiki. You should especially read the logo header section of the latter to understand what types of release dates should be counted when dealing with theatrically released logos, as home video releases of those type of logos not only count but make the lifespan feel inconsistent (the debut date is of a theatrical release whereas the end date is a home media release). If you continue to edit war on the wiki, you will be blocked longer than your previous ban, on top of being indefinitely banned from editing on the Paramount Pictures page, knowing you refuse to cooperate with this particular edit war alongside making plenty of redundant edits on the page (I strongly suggest using the preview button at the end of the source editor for you to determine if you like your changes enough instead of constantly submitting edits). Please be very careful with what edits you make on the wiki, especially on the Paramount Pictures page. Camenati (talk) 17:13, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- I am warning you again for redundant editing. Repeatedly reverting your own edits can be considered spam and continued spamming will result in a block. Again, please carefully think if you like your edits or not before proceeding, and please use the "Show preview" button in source editor to review them. Camenati (talk) 01:36, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
