User talk:Dmehus

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Regarding Rezal

I know you had me unblock him earlier (given I failed to properly warn him about what he was doing before his ban), but I just want to note he has an extensive history of sockpuppetry and disruptive editing on Wikipedia, and has also been editing templates without permission again even after I told him he should seek permission before doing so. CooleyBoy10 (talk) 15:12, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Qualitipedia unblock appeal.

This discussion was hidden by site staff for the following reason:

Irrelevant drama from Qualitipedia

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

I need to get unblocked from Qualitipedia because it has been seven months since the infamous RFC about banning me, and the fact that the users (most notably Radiarr) said I could get unblocked from there on New Year's Day 2023. In addition, I will do helpful edits. MarioBobFan (talk) 23:09, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Dmehus has been inactive for several months now, and Qualitipedia has been closed for a while. You're already contributing to the reboot, so why not continue there? Tali64³ (talk) 23:11, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
I am continuing there, but I would love to get unblocked from the original Qualitipedia site. Also, the original Qualitipedia is still open. I am talking about getting unblocked from the original Qualitipedia and not the original reception wikis. MarioBobFan (talk) 23:14, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I’m a bureaucrat here on AVID. We are not and have never been connected to Qualitipedia and we do not wish to have drama from there brought over to our site. As this conversation is not relevant to our site we ask that you please continue it elsewhere. Talk · Edits 23:31, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.