User talk:DiggaDigga2010: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Latest comment: 2 years ago by DiggaDigga2010 in topic Central Board of Film Censors/Certification (India)

Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
:This is your second warning regarding use of POV terms in mainspace articles with your [[BosBros|recent mainspace article creation]]. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 08:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
:This is your second warning regarding use of POV terms in mainspace articles with your [[BosBros|recent mainspace article creation]]. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 08:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
::You have been warned again regarding POV terms after your [[Dr. Seuss Enterprises|recent section addition]]. Continued use of POV terms, among other editing violations in mainspace may result in a temporary block of your account. In addition to this, please pay attention to the wiki's tutorial guide and the decline messages left on your draft articles. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 03:31, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
::You have been warned again regarding POV terms after your [[Dr. Seuss Enterprises|recent section addition]]. Continued use of POV terms, among other editing violations in mainspace may result in a temporary block of your account. In addition to this, please pay attention to the wiki's tutorial guide and the decline messages left on your draft articles. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 03:31, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

== Warning regarding use of POV terms in mainspace ==

Hello, DiggaDigga2010 and thank you for your major page creations and contributions to the wiki. Unfortunately, it appears you have violated AVID's POV editing guidelines again with your [[Galloping Horse Productions|recent page expansion]] by using first person pronouns to address the elements seen in logos. As you have been told in the past, we do not permit the use of first person or second person pronouns when describing logos, as the articles should be written in a neutral point-of-view so that it remains informative rather than in an inconsistent conversational tone. Although you have used these terms in your drafts with no warning received, the page where you tripped over the POV filter is in mainspace. Unlike draftspace, which is also used to learn what is desired and not desired when publishing articles, if the descriptions were published in mainspace, this will result in an uneven quality in finished or presentable product and there is a chance some readers will point out a recent edit they can directly see that contradicts the rules set by the wiki's editing guidelines. On another note, in case you have not checked your submitted drafts, POV terms is one of the main reasons why they were declined in the past frequently. Granted, you did use them less in your recent draft creations, but still use them from time to time with another editor stepping in to rewrite your descriptions so that it follows editing guidelines.<br>Continued use of POV terms in mainspace may result in another temporary ban. Considering all the recent contributions you have made to the wiki, please take this warning and rule regarding POV terms into consideration. Thank you for your understanding. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 22:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:07, 5 April 2024

Notification of user report


HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 22:59, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Central Board of Film Censors/Certification (India)

Please stop recreating that page. It's not a logo but a certification bumper and we already have a page for that on Company Bumpers. If you recreate it again you will be blocked. Thank you Logohub (talk) 06:41, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

I will stop doing that. DiggaDigga2010 (talk) 00:43, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, DiggaDigga2010 and congrats on your ability to create mainspace articles. Now that you can do that, you'll have to take editing guidelines more seriously. Specifically, the issue with your first mainspace article is your use of POV terms, or first-person pronouns, in addressing the objects in the logo. Your drafts were previously declined for that matter, so let me directly explain that POV terms should be avoided when describing logos. The articles should be written in a neutral point-of-view so that it remains informative rather than in an inconsistent conversational tone. For more things to avoid and add when writing articles in both namespaces (mainspace and draftspace), read the tutorial guide closely. Best of luck in your editing improvements. Camenati (talk) 01:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

This is your second warning regarding use of POV terms in mainspace articles with your recent mainspace article creation. Camenati (talk) 08:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
You have been warned again regarding POV terms after your recent section addition. Continued use of POV terms, among other editing violations in mainspace may result in a temporary block of your account. In addition to this, please pay attention to the wiki's tutorial guide and the decline messages left on your draft articles. Camenati (talk) 03:31, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Warning regarding use of POV terms in mainspace

Hello, DiggaDigga2010 and thank you for your major page creations and contributions to the wiki. Unfortunately, it appears you have violated AVID's POV editing guidelines again with your recent page expansion by using first person pronouns to address the elements seen in logos. As you have been told in the past, we do not permit the use of first person or second person pronouns when describing logos, as the articles should be written in a neutral point-of-view so that it remains informative rather than in an inconsistent conversational tone. Although you have used these terms in your drafts with no warning received, the page where you tripped over the POV filter is in mainspace. Unlike draftspace, which is also used to learn what is desired and not desired when publishing articles, if the descriptions were published in mainspace, this will result in an uneven quality in finished or presentable product and there is a chance some readers will point out a recent edit they can directly see that contradicts the rules set by the wiki's editing guidelines. On another note, in case you have not checked your submitted drafts, POV terms is one of the main reasons why they were declined in the past frequently. Granted, you did use them less in your recent draft creations, but still use them from time to time with another editor stepping in to rewrite your descriptions so that it follows editing guidelines.
Continued use of POV terms in mainspace may result in another temporary ban. Considering all the recent contributions you have made to the wiki, please take this warning and rule regarding POV terms into consideration. Thank you for your understanding. Camenati (talk) 22:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.