User talk:DiggaDigga2010

Notification of user report

HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 22:59, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Central Board of Film Censors/Certification (India)

Please stop recreating that page. It's not a logo but a certification bumper and we already have a page for that on Company Bumpers. If you recreate it again you will be blocked. Thank you Logohub (talk) 06:41, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

I will stop doing that. DiggaDigga2010 (talk) 00:43, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Note on your recent mainspace article creation

Hello, DiggaDigga2010 and congrats on your ability to create mainspace articles. Now that you can do that, you'll have to take editing guidelines more seriously. Specifically, the issue with your first mainspace article is your use of POV terms, or first-person pronouns, in addressing the objects in the logo. Your drafts were previously declined for that matter, so let me directly explain that POV terms should be avoided when describing logos. The articles should be written in a neutral point-of-view so that it remains informative rather than in an inconsistent conversational tone. For more things to avoid and add when writing articles in both namespaces (mainspace and draftspace), read the tutorial guide closely. Best of luck in your editing improvements. Camenati (talk) 01:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

This is your second warning regarding use of POV terms in mainspace articles with your recent mainspace article creation. Camenati (talk) 08:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

You have been warned again regarding POV terms after your recent section addition. Continued use of POV terms, among other editing violations in mainspace may result in a temporary block of your account. In addition to this, please pay attention to the wiki's tutorial guide and the decline messages left on your draft articles. Camenati (talk) 03:31, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Warning regarding use of POV terms in mainspace

Hello, DiggaDigga2010 and thank you for your major page creations and contributions to the wiki. Unfortunately, it appears you have violated AVID's POV editing guidelines again with your recent page expansion by using first person pronouns to address the elements seen in logos. As you have been told in the past, we do not permit the use of first person or second person pronouns when describing logos, as the articles should be written in a neutral point-of-view so that it remains informative rather than in an inconsistent conversational tone. Although you have used these terms in your drafts with no warning received, the page where you tripped over the POV filter is in mainspace. Unlike draftspace, which is also used to learn what is desired and not desired when publishing articles, if the descriptions were published in mainspace, this will result in an uneven quality in finished or presentable product and there is a chance some readers will point out a recent edit they can directly see that contradicts the rules set by the wiki's editing guidelines. On another note, in case you have not checked your submitted drafts, POV terms is one of the main reasons why they were declined in the past frequently. Granted, you did use them less in your recent draft creations, but still use them from time to time with another editor stepping in to rewrite your descriptions so that it follows editing guidelines.
Continued use of POV terms in mainspace may result in another temporary ban. Considering all the recent contributions you have made to the wiki, please take this warning and rule regarding POV terms into consideration. Thank you for your understanding. Camenati (talk) 22:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Regarding moving pages to draftspace

Hello, DiggaDigga2010. Please note that draftspace is used to gradually create and develop articles until they are in a state ready for mainspace. Moving mainspace pages over to said namespace is unnecessary if it's only to add a single, completed section or rewrite a few descriptions. A lot of people do that when the page is in mainspace and that is fine. You may move pages over to draftspace if they are incomplete or have poorly worded descriptions that it may take some time to rewrite. Plus, please be sure to drafty with reason. Per draftspace guidelines, not doing so is considered disruptive. I hope these rules regarding draftspace clarify more about what the namespace should be used for. Camenati (talk) 22:35, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

You have been warned again for moving articles to draftspace without clear reason. You may be blocked if this, among other rule violations, occur again. Camenati (talk) 02:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Temporary partial block notice

You have been previously warned not to break any further rules, but after seeing you have broken a draftspace-related rule, which is submitting drafts while making unsubstantial improvements that mostly ignore the issues raised in the decline message, I have opted to block you from editing specifically in draftspace, as well as creating new pages and files for a temporary period. Please note that if you keep making changes that barely fixes the draft's issues, it will not only continue to be declined again, but show that you have not clearly understood or applied what is needed to be fixed in order for it to be approved for mainspace. Next time, when your partial ban expires, you need to thoroughly examine your draft that contains said issues instead of changing a few words or sentences here and there and label it as ready for mainspace.
Since this is a partial ban, you can still edit other pages on the wiki in any namespace besides draftspace, which includes embedding captures uploaded by other users. However, you may not document new logos during this period or move them over to draftspace to implement your desired changes. Doing so during the duration of your partial ban may result in an indefinite sitewide ban for evading your ongoing block. You should instead re-visit the rules and tutorial guide to read other rules to understand what is desired and not desired when creating pages or documenting new logos.
Lastly, I want to leave this note that me, and other users, have been correcting you throughout most of your drafts in case you have missed: the word "an" should be used before a vowel such as "an apple" and "a" is used before consonant starting words like "a banana". If you believe these declining messages and partial ban are unjustified as a result of your native language, please let me know and I will consider how to approach your submissions and ban. Thank you for your understand and I hope you have improved when you return to creating new pages for the wiki. Camenati (talk) 02:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Warning regarding draft submissions

Hello, DiggaDigga2010. It appears you have submitted a declined draft without making any substantial changes that addresses the declining reasons, in spite of a previous ban that was a result of that. To paraphrase from that warning "if you keep making changes that barely fixes the draft's issues, it will not only continue to be declined again, but show that you have not clearly understood or applied what is needed to be fixed in order for it to be approved for mainspace". If you have questions, concerns, or believe the decline reason is invalid, you should ask the user who rejected the draft instead of resubmitting it without changing anything. If you repeat this behavior again, you may be blocked again from draftspace as well as the ability to create pages and files. This also applies to whenever you submit a draft that ignores previous decline messages sent in your previous drafts. Normally, I would let that slide as users may have issues implementing a specific editing guideline, but because this pattern of neglect is becoming apparent, I'll have to ask you to please consider previous decline reasons. There is not only the incorrect use of the article "a" and "an" (which should be used before a word beginning with a consonant and vowel respectively), but also the infrequent inclusion of POV terms such as "we", despite being warned several times about that. After all these warnings, it is expected you learn from these misuses and can apply them into your descriptions easily, but choosing to ignore them displays an unconstructive behavior. Any additional rule violation will also lead to that, possibly a sitewide block. I hope this warning serves well to your improvements. Your page creations are still valued in the wiki and I thank you for the contributions you have done to the site. However, please be sure to take note of criticism the next time you work on a declined draft, particularly yours. Camenati (talk) 19:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC)