Forum:I might have found a way to get the cheesy factor back (Proposal): Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Content added Content deleted
imported>CLGW1K1R8CKS
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 43: Line 43:
|text=Sounds like a nice idea.
|text=Sounds like a nice idea.
|username=CLGW1K1R8CKS
|username=CLGW1K1R8CKS
|rank=User
|timestamp=16 October 2021
}}
{{Forumpost
|text=Ooh, I like this.
|username=AlmightyKingPrawn
|rank=User
|rank=User
|timestamp=16 October 2021
|timestamp=16 October 2021

Revision as of 15:29, 16 October 2021


avatar
VPJHuk
User
16 October 2021

Reply or edit
Report post



So, we all know what happened to the Cheesy Factor, right? (And if you don't, it got replaced in 2018 with the Editor's Note alongside the Scare Factor).

Well, many have wanted to get those back, but to no avail. However, I might have found a way to get the Cheesy Factor back, but in a more informative form.

Let me present to you.. Errors/Oversights.

Now, this sorta is the cheesy factor, as the factor meant that it was something in the logo that didn't age well. Well, this is sort of like it, but it can't (and shouldn't) be opinionated, as you need actual evidence of this happening.

Now, how can this be presented in the page? Let me show an example.

Let's say it's the Paramount logo from 2002-2011.

Errors/Oversights: Earlier versions of the logo (mostly the 90th anniversary variant) has the clouds ending at the bottom right during the pan to the mountain, meaning they are a 2D texture pasted behind the logo.

You can try spotting this oversight by checking this capture.

Now, this is definitely optional, like not every logo has to have an error/oversight in it.

I think this is a neat little addition to the wiki that could be added, mainly because of the demand of the Cheesy Factor coming back, as well as that it is.. well.. more information to the wiki!

Anyways, what do you guys think? Leave your opinions down below. :)


Reply or edit
Report post



As I said, this would not work however.


avatar
LogoFun13-YT
User
16 October 2021

Reply or edit
Report post



I am supporting this.


avatar
CLGW1K1R8CKS
User
16 October 2021

Reply or edit
Report post



Sounds like a nice idea.


avatar
AlmightyKingPrawn
User
16 October 2021

Reply or edit
Report post



Ooh, I like this.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.