Forum:I hate the new rule: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Content added Content deleted
imported>RodneySystems2007
(Created page with "{{Forumheader|General Discussion}} {{Forumpost |text=I've been gone for well over 2 months, and this is what I come back to. The new rule contains that you will delete any image that does not contain descriptions. Now this goes against what the wiki stands for. And I am fumed with anger that this is a new rule. I'd like to talk to any of the admins here. Or anyone who also agrees or disagrees with this rule, I'm spreading my opinion, and I hope you accept it, whether you...")
 
imported>MirahezeGDPR b51743e23ae5338df4b23e5c709738fa
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Forumheader|General Discussion}}
{{Forumheader|General Discussion}}

{{Forumcat|General Discussion}}
{{Forumpost
{{Forumpost
|text=I've been gone for well over 2 months, and this is what I come back to. The new rule contains that you will delete any image that does not contain descriptions. Now this goes against what the wiki stands for. And I am fumed with anger that this is a new rule. I'd like to talk to any of the admins here. Or anyone who also agrees or disagrees with this rule, I'm spreading my opinion, and I hope you accept it, whether you agree or disagree, I do not care your opinion is yours. But I would love this rule to be tooken down. And I do not care if you're an admin or not, I do not see you as a Supreme deity. Or as a God. If you abuse your power as admin, you will do not deserve such title. Anyways talk to me, I see you as a normal human, so please tell me some information about this rule so we can all move on. And this page is supposed to express what we love the most. My little brother has been forced to put descriptions. On his centron logo finds. And if this is bugging my brother, it also bugs me.
|text=I've been gone for well over 2 months, and this is what I come back to. The new rule contains that you will delete any image that does not contain descriptions. Now this goes against what the wiki stands for. And I am fumed with anger that this is a new rule. I'd like to talk to any of the admins here. Or anyone who also agrees or disagrees with this rule, I'm spreading my opinion, and I hope you accept it, whether you agree or disagree, I do not care your opinion is yours. But I would love this rule to be tooken down. And I do not care if you're an admin or not, I do not see you as a Supreme deity. Or as a God. If you abuse your power as admin, you will do not deserve such title. Anyways talk to me, I see you as a normal human, so please tell me some information about this rule so we can all move on. And this page is supposed to express what we love the most. My little brother has been forced to put descriptions. On his centron logo finds. And if this is bugging my brother, it also bugs me.
Line 6: Line 8:
|timestamp=13 May 2022
|timestamp=13 May 2022
}}
}}
{{Forumpost
{{Forumcat|General Discussion}}
|text=And what's wrong with having to add descriptions to the pages? It's a Wiki; the point of it is to keep everything updated on logo information. That's what the Wiki is. And it really doesn't look good when you have pictures of variants, but no info on what the logo is like or even where it come from. And in worst cases, those pictures can even become logo mysteries. I don't expect to be treated like a god because I'm not one. But you still need to follow what we say. We have these rules for a good reason. And if you or your brother can't handle that, then you can both leave. Otherwise, just help us maintain the integrity of the site and the descriptions. It's not asking too much. Now I don't want to see anymore whining here, clear?
|username=MatthewLMayfield
|rank=Administrator
|timestamp=13 May 2022
}}
{{Forumpost
|username=MatthewLMayfield
|rank=Administrator
|timestamp=13 May 2022
}}

Revision as of 02:16, 13 May 2022


Reply or edit
Report post



I've been gone for well over 2 months, and this is what I come back to. The new rule contains that you will delete any image that does not contain descriptions. Now this goes against what the wiki stands for. And I am fumed with anger that this is a new rule. I'd like to talk to any of the admins here. Or anyone who also agrees or disagrees with this rule, I'm spreading my opinion, and I hope you accept it, whether you agree or disagree, I do not care your opinion is yours. But I would love this rule to be tooken down. And I do not care if you're an admin or not, I do not see you as a Supreme deity. Or as a God. If you abuse your power as admin, you will do not deserve such title. Anyways talk to me, I see you as a normal human, so please tell me some information about this rule so we can all move on. And this page is supposed to express what we love the most. My little brother has been forced to put descriptions. On his centron logo finds. And if this is bugging my brother, it also bugs me.


Reply or edit
Report post



And what's wrong with having to add descriptions to the pages? It's a Wiki; the point of it is to keep everything updated on logo information. That's what the Wiki is. And it really doesn't look good when you have pictures of variants, but no info on what the logo is like or even where it come from. And in worst cases, those pictures can even become logo mysteries. I don't expect to be treated like a god because I'm not one. But you still need to follow what we say. We have these rules for a good reason. And if you or your brother can't handle that, then you can both leave. Otherwise, just help us maintain the integrity of the site and the descriptions. It's not asking too much. Now I don't want to see anymore whining here, clear?


Reply or edit
Report post



{{{text}}}

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.