AVID:Requests for Comment/Since MDY and DMY date formats are being used accordingly, why not use the YMD date format as well?: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (18 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{archive top|Closing as {{rejected|failed}} per author request. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 19:24, 6 September 2023 (UTC)}} |
|||
==Since MDY and DMY date formats are being used accordingly, why not use the YMD date format as well?== |
==Since MDY and DMY date formats are being used accordingly, why not use the YMD date format as well?== |
||
Back in February, before I joined the Miraheze site, there was [[AVID:Requests for Comment/Use MDY and DMY date formats accordingly|a RfC proposal involving use of date formats according to country of origin]]. The proposal was passed of course, but one date format was not brought up in that proposal: the year-month-day format used in Japan. |
Back in February, before I joined the Miraheze site, there was [[AVID:Requests for Comment/Use MDY and DMY date formats accordingly|a RfC proposal involving use of date formats according to country of origin]]. The proposal was passed of course, but one date format was not brought up in that proposal: the year-month-day format used in Japan. |
||
| Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
===Support=== |
===Support=== |
||
#{{Support}} Could do, I guess. [[User:Gilby1385|Gilby1385]] ([[User talk:Gilby1385|talk]]) 22:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Support}} Could do, I guess. [[User:Gilby1385|Gilby1385]] ([[User talk:Gilby1385|talk]]) 22:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC) |
||
#<s>{{Support}} [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 22:58, 2 September 2023 (UTC)</s> |
|||
#{{Support}} [[User:ForcedExcess26|ForcedExcess26]] ([[User talk:ForcedExcess26|talk]]) 00:21, 3 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
#{{Support}} I'm confused on why this hasn't been a thing yet tbh [[User:Tabit|Tabit]] ([[User talk:Tabit|talk]]) 01:42, 3 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
#{{Support}} The ISO format is very accessibility friendly. [[User:VenusandMars77|VenusandMars77]] ([[User talk:VenusandMars77|talk]]) 20:14, 4 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
#'''''Vote [[Special:Diff/658064/658135|struck]] by [[User:Raidarr|Raidarr]]''''' [[User:Ashley Taylor|Ashley Taylor ft. Cure Finale (soulbond friend) and CW/RB (account manager w/ shared pet)]] ([[User talk:Ashley Taylor|talk]]) 07:52, 6 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
#:You can't support a proposal twice. [[User:Logoarto|Logoarto]] ([[User talk:Logoarto|talk]]) 08:54, 6 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
===Oppose=== |
===Oppose=== |
||
#{{Oppose}} I believe it should be the other way around. Allowing any kind of date format to be used makes nn/nn/nn cases ambiguous, potentially causing trouble for editors and readers. I want to make it known that this serves as both a counterpoint to this and the already passed RfC; it makes no sense to oppose a third format without opposing a second format. [[User:Chloafifteen|Chloafifteen]] ([[User talk:Chloafifteen|talk]]) 10:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
#{{Oppose}} per Chloe. [[User:Logoarto|Logoarto]] ([[User talk:Logoarto|talk]]) 09:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
#{{Oppose}} Per above. I feel like this is one of the situations where consistency is more important than appeasing every single group. [[User:Eternity Media Group|Eternity Media Group]] ([[User talk:Eternity Media Group|talk]]) 09:56, 5 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
#{{Oppose}} per everyone else in this section. [[User:Charlie179|Charlie179]] ([[User talk:Charlie179|talk]]) 10:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
#{{Oppose}} after realizing the issues with this proposal. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 17:59, 6 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
#Given how Chloe has successfully convinced users to go back to the "Americanization" of dates (as a current RfC suggests), I'm disappointed to say that I have to withdraw this proposal. --[[User:AUnnamedDragon|AUnnamedDragon]] 2:42 PM, September 6, 2023 (CET) |
|||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
||
__NOTOC__ |
__NOTOC__ |
||
{{Archive bottom}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 19:24, 6 September 2023
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Since MDY and DMY date formats are being used accordingly, why not use the YMD date format as well?
Back in February, before I joined the Miraheze site, there was a RfC proposal involving use of date formats according to country of origin. The proposal was passed of course, but one date format was not brought up in that proposal: the year-month-day format used in Japan.
Given how American, Canadian, and Filipino logos and other such audiovisual things must use the MDY format (i.e. September 1, 2023) and British and Australian audiovisual things, including logos, must use the DMY format (i.e. 1 September 2023), why not require Japanese logos and what not (e.g. Studio Ghibli and Capcom) to use the YMD format (i.e. 2023 September 1)?
What are your thoughts? --AUnnamedDragon 10:21 PM, September 1, 2023 (CET)
Support
Support Could do, I guess. Gilby1385 (talk) 22:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)- Support
· Talk · Edits 22:58, 2 September 2023 (UTC) - Support ForcedExcess26 (talk) 00:21, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support I'm confused on why this hasn't been a thing yet tbh Tabit (talk) 01:42, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support The ISO format is very accessibility friendly. VenusandMars77 (talk) 20:14, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Vote struck by Raidarr Ashley Taylor ft. Cure Finale (soulbond friend) and CW/RB (account manager w/ shared pet) (talk) 07:52, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
Oppose I believe it should be the other way around. Allowing any kind of date format to be used makes nn/nn/nn cases ambiguous, potentially causing trouble for editors and readers. I want to make it known that this serves as both a counterpoint to this and the already passed RfC; it makes no sense to oppose a third format without opposing a second format. Chloafifteen (talk) 10:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)- Oppose per Chloe. Logoarto (talk) 09:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above. I feel like this is one of the situations where consistency is more important than appeasing every single group. Eternity Media Group (talk) 09:56, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per everyone else in this section. Charlie179 (talk) 10:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose after realizing the issues with this proposal. · Talk · Edits 17:59, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Comments
- Given how Chloe has successfully convinced users to go back to the "Americanization" of dates (as a current RfC suggests), I'm disappointed to say that I have to withdraw this proposal. --AUnnamedDragon 2:42 PM, September 6, 2023 (CET)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
