AVID:Requests for Comment/Shift the "User Reports" page to major rule violations only: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Archive top|Speedy closing per author request as {{rejected|failed}}. ''[[User:Logohub|<span style="font-size: 120%;"><span style="font-family:'serif';">Logohub</span></span>]]'' ([[User talk:Logohub|talk]]) 13:34, 13 February 2023 (UTC)}}
==Shift the "User Reports" page to major rule violations only==
==Shift the "User Reports" page to major rule violations only==
The reports on various users for small reasons have appeared to get out of hand, especially with a lot of them being minor rule violations such as "section misuse" or "single upload related reasons". A lot of them feel like they don't deserve immediate action as opposed to vandalism/sockpuppetry.
The reports on various users for small reasons have appeared to get out of hand, especially with a lot of them being minor rule violations such as "section misuse" or "single upload related reasons". A lot of them feel like they don't deserve immediate action as opposed to vandalism/sockpuppetry.


To set the record of reporting a user on this site, I think major rule violations should only be valid in this case. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 18:53, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
To set the record of reporting a user on this site, I think major rule violations should only be valid in this case.

EDIT: As I have previously mentioned, I request this proposal to be closed. My reason is provided in the comments section. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 18:53, 10 February 2023 (UTC)


===Support===
===Support===
Line 11: Line 14:
===Oppose===
===Oppose===
{{Oppose}} I don't see why we should do this, reports are meant to be for any kind of damage done to the wiki. [[User:TheNintendoGuy9009|TheNintendoGuy9009]] ([[User talk:TheNintendoGuy9009|talk]]) 19:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
{{Oppose}} I don't see why we should do this, reports are meant to be for any kind of damage done to the wiki. [[User:TheNintendoGuy9009|TheNintendoGuy9009]] ([[User talk:TheNintendoGuy9009|talk]]) 19:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

:I agree! [[File:Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg|link=User:Sickminecraft45]] [[User_talk:Sickminecraft45| ('''''Talk to Me!''''')]] 19:03, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
{{Oppose}} per above. [[User:Sonicfan19198282|Sonicfan19198282]] ([[User talk:Sonicfan19198282|talk]]) 09:01, 11 February 2023 (UTC)


===Comments===
===Comments===
{{Comment}} I request closure as this has started mainly because this is a request, after careful thinking, I do not fully agree about. Thinking about this a little further, there are plenty of valid minor reports done on the wiki. It's not the minor reasons that is the problem, it's that I frequent that page way too much. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 19:06, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

{{Comment}} I request a speedy closure as per the author. [[File:Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg|link=User:Sickminecraft45]] [[User_talk:Sickminecraft45| ('''''Talk to Me!''''')]] 19:09, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

[[Category:Requests for Comment]]
[[Category:Requests for Comment]]
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{Archive bottom}}

Latest revision as of 13:34, 13 February 2023


Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.