AVID:Requests for Comment/Shift the "User Reports" page to major rule violations only: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content added Content deleted
(→Oppose) |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Archive top|Speedy closing per author request as {{rejected|failed}}. ''[[User:Logohub|<span style="font-size: 120%;"><span style="font-family:'serif';">Logohub</span></span>]]'' ([[User talk:Logohub|talk]]) 13:34, 13 February 2023 (UTC)}}
==Shift the "User Reports" page to major rule violations only==
The reports on various users for small reasons have appeared to get out of hand, especially with a lot of them being minor rule violations such as "section misuse" or "single upload related reasons". A lot of them feel like they don't deserve immediate action as opposed to vandalism/sockpuppetry.
To set the record of reporting a user on this site, I think major rule violations should only be valid in this case.
EDIT: As I have previously mentioned, I request this proposal to be closed. My reason is provided in the comments section. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 18:53, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
===Support===
Line 22 ⟶ 25:
[[Category:Requests for Comment]]
__NOTOC__
{{Archive bottom}}
|
Latest revision as of 13:34, 13 February 2023