User talk:SuperMax124: Difference between revisions
imported>Blue2000 (→Videos) |
(→Videos: Reply) |
||
Line 44:
Why did you remove the video i added on the [[Erica Messer Productions]] article?, there is point to add them! [[User:Blue2000|Blue2000]] ([[User talk:Blue2000|talk]]) 21:17, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
:Why? I think his removal of those videos is justified since there is no animation or music in the logo, so adding a video of a logo that is literally the image shown on the article and nothing else is pretty redundant. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 08:26, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
== Necessary ==
|
Revision as of 08:26, 24 August 2022
Page formatting
Hi SuperMax124. Please use Template:PageCredits for the credits. You can read CLG:CREDITS for more information on using the template. Also, Background and years should be in Heading 3, and add the appropriate categories to the pages. Thanks. Logohub (talk) 08:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Question
Where did you find the opening logos for Malignant, and is there a video on YouTube? / 12:19, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Regarding your recent edits to a sock:
Hello, I thought I'd just come by to tell you that I have been monitoring these socks of Chuck Quenano, and I will be reporting them to a Steward as a local community member in due course, giving them the diffs they need to launch an investigation. Rest assured that a Steward will look into them when they get the chance to see it. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) 10:30, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- PS: The place where I've been monitoring them from was from Miraheze's server on Discord. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) 10:32, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- Just saw their contributions, thought I saw that "CINEMARK IS FRICKIN TRIGGERED" vandalism before. Turns out, the users Csr3011 and Μπέλα2006 (the latter we thought was a user in good faith) vandalized the wiki with the same phrase before. Perhaps this Chuck Quenano is connected to them? Logohub (talk) 10:41, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for clarifying. SuperMax124 (talk) 10:32, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
I need to come clean
I need to clarify that I won't add redundant/uncessary videos, I will focus on uploading logos and rare finds, I think you need to cancel your report against me. MJ2003 (talk) 04:47, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Alright. Mind if I revert your edits then? SuperMax124 (talk) 12:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
I'm sorry about the space after - on Double Fine
It's so common that I thought it was part of site formatting. I'm sorry that I've edited maybe hundreds of pages that way. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 15:20, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Videos
Why do you think videos are unnecessary? Camenati (talk) 00:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- They aren’t that unnecessary. Though if it’s a still logo then it doesn’t need a video. SuperMax124 (talk) 00:13, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- And what makes them that way? I understand with the still logos but the animated ones? Camenati (talk) 00:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- well, if there is too much videos of the animated one I have to cut them down. SuperMax124 (talk) 00:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- I agree that there shouldn't be too many videos but I don't think ALL of the videos should be removed. Perhaps one or a few videos for each logo is alright. Camenati (talk) 00:34, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Also remember we do have the
collapsible
option for embeds now if you think the amount of videos is going to impact loading performance. Talk · Edits 02:04, 18 May 2022 (UTC)- Gotcha you two. SuperMax124 (talk) 02:49, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- well, if there is too much videos of the animated one I have to cut them down. SuperMax124 (talk) 00:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- And what makes them that way? I understand with the still logos but the animated ones? Camenati (talk) 00:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- They aren’t that unnecessary. Though if it’s a still logo then it doesn’t need a video. SuperMax124 (talk) 00:13, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Why did you remove the video i added on the Erica Messer Productions article?, there is point to add them! Blue2000 (talk) 21:17, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
- Why? I think his removal of those videos is justified since there is no animation or music in the logo, so adding a video of a logo that is literally the image shown on the article and nothing else is pretty redundant. Camenati (talk) 08:26, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Necessary
Not necessary? I haven't done anything bad/wrong on the Warner Bros. Pictures page. DipperGoodspeed1994 (talk) 04:44, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
I removed that part from the Editor's Note on the 14th logo because what you wrote was not needed. Just wait for a byline update or something. SuperMax124 (talk) 04:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)