AVID:Requests for Comment/Remove Translations feature: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{Support|Strongest}} '''''in the entire face of the galaxy''''' all they do is clutter up the search and give that stupid "you are editing a translated page" banner. I hope we rid this one for good [[User:CharlieFiddlesticks|CharlieFiddlesticks]] ([[User talk:CharlieFiddlesticks|talk]]) 19:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC) |
{{Support|Strongest}} '''''in the entire face of the galaxy''''' all they do is clutter up the search and give that stupid "you are editing a translated page" banner. I hope we rid this one for good [[User:CharlieFiddlesticks|CharlieFiddlesticks]] ([[User talk:CharlieFiddlesticks|talk]]) 19:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC) |
||
{{Support|weak}} As the one who originally started translations, maybe it was simply a case of "too soon". If we had a larger contingent of multilingual editors to work on these then the wonkiness of the extension might well be worth putting up with, but when I looked at the translation stats, we had a grand total of ''2'' editors working on translations this month. That's nowhere near enough to justify continuing with this. Perhaps one day if we have a bigger contingent of willing translators we could try again, but for now, I must reluctantly support this proposal. [[File:sig.png|100px|link=User:Hb1290]] '''''[[User talk:Hb1290|Talk]]''''' <b>·</b> '''''[[Special:Contributions/Hb1290|Edits]]''''' 22:39, 2 November 2022 (UTC) |
{{Support|weak}} As the one who originally started translations, maybe it was simply a case of "too soon". If we had a larger contingent of multilingual editors to work on these then the wonkiness of the extension might well be worth putting up with, but when I looked at the translation stats, we had a grand total of ''2'' editors working on translations this month. That's nowhere near enough to justify continuing with this. Perhaps one day if we have a bigger contingent of willing translators we could try again, but for now, I must reluctantly support this proposal. [[File:sig.png|100px|link=User:Hb1290]] '''''[[User talk:Hb1290|Talk]]''''' <b>·</b> '''''[[Special:Contributions/Hb1290|Edits]]''''' 22:39, 2 November 2022 (UTC) |
||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
Revision as of 22:39, 2 November 2022
In 2021, a Translation feature was implemented onto the wiki. Fast-forward, we are nearing 2023, and this feature has remained underutilized on the wiki. Users who supported the original proposal argue that it clogged up the search engine, and that updating articles with translation became complicated due to having to remark the page.
This was originally proposed by User:SuperMax124 in the AVID Forums page.
ifyoudarethenpizzait aka Compooper (talk) 15:19, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Support
Support What Compooper said CalvinWilkerson (talk) 15:28, 2 November 2022 (UTC)- Support Read my reasoning for further details, but to keep it brief, it makes both navigation and updating the article difficult. Also, as SuperMax said, I think they should be phased out entirely since they have been underutilized and badly executed. Camenati (talk) 15:32, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Support in the entire face of the galaxy all they do is clutter up the search and give that stupid "you are editing a translated page" banner. I hope we rid this one for good CharlieFiddlesticks (talk) 19:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Support As the one who originally started translations, maybe it was simply a case of "too soon". If we had a larger contingent of multilingual editors to work on these then the wonkiness of the extension might well be worth putting up with, but when I looked at the translation stats, we had a grand total of 2 editors working on translations this month. That's nowhere near enough to justify continuing with this. Perhaps one day if we have a bigger contingent of willing translators we could try again, but for now, I must reluctantly support this proposal. 
Talk · Edits 22:39, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
