Audiovisual Identity Database:Requests for Comment/merge the 1st and 3rd dickhouse productions logo: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Latest revision as of 07:57, 28 February 2023

i think the 1st and 3rd dickhouse productions logos are the same. i think we should merge those logos.

Look, we know, the RfC for preventing these types of proposals hasn't passed yet. But still, as said before, logo separating/merging proposals like this would be better fit for discussing on a talk page. I don't get why this needs to be put on an RfC. Sorry for my bluntness but this is kinda annoying me ifyoudarethenpizzait aka Compooper (talk) 23:23, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ===Abstain===
+*Look, we know, the RfC for preventing these types of proposals hasn't passed yet. But still, as said before, logo separating/merging proposals like this would be better fit for discussing on a talk page. I don't get why this needs to be put on an RfC. Sorry for my bluntness but this is kinda annoying me [[User:Compooper|ifyoudarethenpizzait aka Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 23:23, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 ===Oppose===
@@ Line 10: / Line 11: @@
 # Please see [[AVID:Requests for Comment/Define appropriate use for Requests for Comment]] [[User:CalvinWilkerson|CalvinWilkerson]] ([[User talk:CalvinWilkerson|talk]]) 23:04, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 [[Category:Requests for Comment]]
+[[Category:Closed Requests for Comment]]