Audiovisual Identity Database:Requests for Comment/Remove the mascots from the wiki.

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Remove the mascots from the wiki.

Since their introduction, the mascots.... have not been used. Funny how we all wanted them, and that RfC passed, yet we have not used them at all. Because of this, I suggest we remove them because of their lack of usage, and the fact that mascots for the wiki were proposed by DanteWilliams (then DHX Cookie Jar Fanatic) here.

"One thing we could possibly get behind is a mascot for the wiki" - DHX Cookie Jar Fanatic

One final thing, why did we want mascots in the first place if we weren't gonna use them anyway? IAmThe789Guy (talk) 22:22, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Support

Abstain

  1.  Abstain I don't really care either way. Gilby1385 (talk) 15:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose NancerAVID (talk) 22:38, 13 March 2023
  2. Oppose. Said user only made one of the mascots, and we have removed that one. The others are fine as-is. Dominicmgm (talk) 22:40, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
  3. Oppose per Dominicmgm. Plus drawing them all takes time. That's probably why we haven't implemented them yet. We probably need to make AVID:Ace and AVID:Vivi pages though. · Talk · Edits 22:41, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
  4. Oppose Not gonna happen. ShawnTehLogoBoi (talk) 23:02, 13 March 2023
  5. Oppose ZephyrFromAvalon (talk) 00:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
  6. Oppose No just no ForcedExcess26 (talk) 01:05, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
  7. Oppose per everyone else. PokeRapMonster (talk) 07:08, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
  8. Oppose Logohub (talk) 16:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
  9. Oppose since Corus announced Teletoon will be closing, and the same with ITV and CITV, because as I said on your forum, these mascots have potential, and they just need a good idea. For example, I had an idea for them, 65 million years ago. 16:35, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
    someone didnt get the memo NancerAVID (talk) 17:09, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
    Didn't we get rid of those "strongest support/oppose since X" messages? · Talk · Edits 17:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
    Variants of support/oppose have been blocked. Support/Oppose since X hasn't. 17:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
    im pretty sure it has NancerAVID (talk) 17:56, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
    Besides, "Oppose since X" is very grammatically incorrect. · Talk · Edits 18:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
    I know, that's why I want to bring the variants back. I saw no problem with them. 18:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
    They were very distracting, and were used to avoid making thoughtful arguments. · Talk · Edits 18:37, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
    i highly suggest we end this discussion here and actually focus on the intended topic. Airvibes (talk) 18:57, 14 March 2023
  10. Oppose All you're doing is wasting potential. Come ON!! If you're gonna represent a community, it's at least recommendable because they're a great strategy for promoting different things. 18:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
  11. Oppose This guy is very drunk now --'''Ashley Taylor''' (My Discord account (Excessive Avarice#1153) got banned from AVID Community Discord for abnormal activities and my soulbond (Cure Finale#1535) got banned too for plasticity reported her freudian slip and correction with dyno.gg log) (talk) 19:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
  12. I hereby Oppose this idea, because of many reasons. ∞~𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮-𝙍𝙤𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙨~∞ (꧁𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠 𝙋𝙖𝙜𝙚꧂) | (꧁𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙨꧂) 19:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
  13. Oppose as per everyone above (Talk to Me!) 20:32, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Comments

 Comment: I smell a SNOW closure coming. Gilby1385 (talk) 19:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.