Audiovisual Identity Database:Requests for Comment/Only censor pornographic and/or sexual nudity: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archive top|Closing as {{approved|passed}}. [[User:Logoarto|Logoarto]] ([[User talk:Logoarto|talk]]) 11:17, 3 July 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
==Only censor pornographic and/or sexual nudity== |
==Only censor pornographic and/or sexual nudity== |
||
Another proposal I'd like to make is to only censor/spoiler pornographic or sexual nudity, or if the logo is made for a porn studio. I don't think something like the Vitruvian Man (which appears on many children's books anyway) or the statue of David by Michelangelo or a statue of nude deity should be censored to be honest, as they are artistic and not really NSFW in my opinion. Often these logos also appear on films that are not rated R. |
Another proposal I'd like to make is to only censor/spoiler pornographic or sexual nudity, or if the logo is made for a porn studio. I don't think something like the Vitruvian Man (which appears on many children's books anyway) or the statue of David by Michelangelo or a statue of nude deity should be censored to be honest, as they are artistic and not really NSFW in my opinion. Often these logos also appear on films that are not rated R. |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
||
{{Archive bottom}} |
|||
Revision as of 11:17, 3 July 2024
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Only censor pornographic and/or sexual nudity
Another proposal I'd like to make is to only censor/spoiler pornographic or sexual nudity, or if the logo is made for a porn studio. I don't think something like the Vitruvian Man (which appears on many children's books anyway) or the statue of David by Michelangelo or a statue of nude deity should be censored to be honest, as they are artistic and not really NSFW in my opinion. Often these logos also appear on films that are not rated R.
I'd like to hear your thoughts about this.
Support
Support because you've got a good point (even though you didn't bring up the NC-17 rating... not that it would matter given that rating's reputation). Hell, the logo for Moving Pictures isn't even hidden behind spoilers due to the fact that the girl featured in the logo is naked, but no particularly graphic nudity is ever present. --AUnnamedDragon 2:03 PM, June 26, 2024 (CET)- Support
(TALK•CONTRIBUTIONS) 18:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC) - Support Gilby1385 (talk) 18:46, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support I thought the proposal is already made earlier.
| (lets play football) 19:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC) - Support
· Talk · Edits 19:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC) - Support Camenati (talk) 20:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Little more to say. Compooper (talk) 21:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yeah it makes more sense this way (since I have fallen victim to this thrice)… Electra (Discussion area ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 03:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Completely agreeing on this one.
(Feel free to chat with me (if you want)!) 22:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
Comment: Wait. But why do we have to censor the logos of porn companies? Well, we do but what about ones with no graphic nudity yet still belonging to an adult company? (Feel free to chat with me (if you want)!) 22:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
