Audiovisual Identity Database:Requests for Comment/Only censor pornographic and/or sexual nudity: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|submit=Yes |
|submit=Yes |
||
|staffreason1={{Approved}} [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 17:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC) |
|staffreason1={{Approved}} [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 17:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
|staffreason2={{Approved}} [[User:Compooper|Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 17:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
==Only censor pornographic and/or sexual nudity== |
==Only censor pornographic and/or sexual nudity== |
Revision as of 17:43, 26 June 2024
![]() | This proposal has been submitted for review. If a week has passed and this proposal is still not reviewed, please notify site staff. Please do not vote on the RFC yet, as staff review is ongoing. To add reasoning, use the following parameters "staffreason1" or "staffreason2" Staff member 1: Staff member 2: Last edited by Compooper (talk | contribs) 10 days ago. (Update) |
Only censor pornographic and/or sexual nudity
Another proposal I'd like to make is to only censor/spoiler pornographic or sexual nudity, or if the logo is made for a porn studio. I don't think something like the Vitruvian Man (which appears on many children's books anyway) or the statue of David by Michelangelo or a statue of nude deity should be censored to be honest, as they are artistic and not really NSFW in my opinion. Often these logos also appear on films that are not rated R.
I'd like to hear your thoughts about this.