Audiovisual Identity Database:Requests for Comment/New/Update Block Meter: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 08:26, 28 February 2023

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing proposal as failed. Logohub (talk) 13:24, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Today I am here requesting we make a new "Block O Meter" type thing to be less harsh to noobs.

Besides our trolls and sockers, we should rate our blocks based on the following chart.

Warning

Second Warning

(NEW) Third Warning. This will be their final warning just in case they don't get the memo.

(NEW) Hour-ish Block. A whole hour to reflect on what they did. User returns to editing after the hour of reading the rules.

24 Hour (1 Day) Block.

76 Hour (3 Day) Block.

168 Hour (1 Week) Block.

(NEW) 336 Hour (2 week) Block. At this point they should get the memo to stop

720 Hour (1 Month) Block.

(NEW) 2160 (2 Month) Block. This will be the user's final chance and warning.

Indefinite (Permanent) Block.

This chart will give the user 11 chances to make this right. If they don't live up to the 11, they get permanently block from the site. By the way, this won't apply to our average trolls and sock puppets, they get immediately Perma blocked.

Not opposed to the idea, but shouldn't admins make their best judgement on what block time fits the bill? Additionally, I would oppose the year-long ban, as at that point, it's basically indefinite. Maybe replace that with an indefinite block with appeals after 1 year. Just some food for thought. Blad (talk) 02:15, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

ok

(lets talks) 02:36, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

but some admins might be too hard on new users who don't know what the guide is

(lets talks) 02:38, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

If an admin is being too harsh to new contributors, they should probably be given the boot. A good admin would redirect contributors to the correct steps to take, without instantly resorting to the ban hammer. If a user ignores the warning/doesn't listen, then they can be blocked. --Blad (talk • contribs • global) 12:36, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

I just want people to have more chances before being Perma banned

(lets talks) 15:05, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Oppose the one we have works fine. MinistrycraftEntertainment (talk) 07:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC) Oppose per MinistrycraftEntertainment. Logohub (talk) 10:18, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Category:Requests for Comment]]
+[[Category:Failed Requests for Comment]]
+<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa">
+:The following discussion is closed. '''Please do not modify it'''. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
+::Closing proposal as '''failed'''. ''[[User:Logohub|<span style="font-size: 120%;"><span style="font-family:'serif';">Logohub</span></span>]]'' ([[User talk:Logohub|talk]]) 13:24, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
+----
 Today I am here requesting we make a new "Block O Meter" type thing to be less harsh to noobs.
@@ Line 37: / Line 42: @@
 {{Oppose|strong}} the one we have works fine. [[User:MinistrycraftEntertainment|MinistrycraftEntertainment]] ([[User talk:MinistrycraftEntertainment|talk]]) 07:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 {{Oppose}} per MinistrycraftEntertainment. ''[[User:Logohub|<span style="font-size: 120%;"><span style="font-family:'serif';">Logohub</span></span>]]'' ([[User talk:Logohub|talk]]) 10:18, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
+----
+</div>