Audiovisual Identity Database:Requests for Comment/Music/Sounds section revamp: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 00:19, 5 October 2023

i have got two proposals for revamps of the Music/Sounds section:

as the title would imply, i am proposing the rename of the "Music/Sounds" section to just "Audio". reasons being:

to me, the Music/Sounds name sounds very clunky, and the use of the word Sounds makes me think that whoever named that forgot about the word Audio
in a similar manner to the FX rename to Technique, Audio is more concise than Music/Sounds
accounts for other audio in logos. e.g. voiceovers
ties in with the wiki name

Diberhaze (talk) 22:18, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Support Oh. Yes. · Talk · Edits 23:21, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Support It makes sense with a simpler term like "Audio" and I can really see your points regarding this section's new direction... Camenati (talk) 00:06, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Support, particularly for consistency across the wiki with this specific section. Eternity Media Group (talk) 00:15, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Support I voiced my concerns about why "Music/Sounds" was a weak name. Again with the voiceovers point, "Audio" is much more inclusive of all types of cues that could happen during a logo's soundtrack. Compooper (talk) 00:19, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Oppose It seems like a good idea, but unfortunately I need to oppose it because I don't want a rename, I just find it annoying that the Wiki is doing more and more unnecessary rebrands. TPatKB (AKA Mr Vadimon) (this is my talk page) 00:02, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Please try and provide a proper reason as to why it's a bad idea, beyond just "I don't like change". Eternity Media Group (talk) 00:15, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Again, Like the title says, if a logo doesn't have audio, the section is not there instead of just saying None.

Diberhaze (talk) 22:18, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Oppose Same reason as above. TPatKB (AKA Mr Vadimon) (this is my talk page) 00:02, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Oppose ...however, I don't agree with removing it if it has no songs or sound effects. That is like saying we should remove the Technique section if it is a still logo, which is necessary if people want to know if a logo is animated or has accompanying audio. It can also provide more detail to logos that don't have video captures available or those that are dead. Camenati (talk) 00:06, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
1. Good reason to oppose. TPatKB (AKA Mr Vadimon) (this is my talk page) 00:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Per Camenati. Eternity Media Group (talk) 00:15, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 #{{Support}} It makes sense with a simpler term like "Audio" and I can really see your points regarding this section's new direction... [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 00:06, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
 #{{Support}}, particularly for consistency across the wiki with this specific section. [[User:Eternity Media Group|Eternity Media Group]] ([[User talk:Eternity Media Group|talk]]) 00:15, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
+#{{Support}} I voiced my concerns about why "Music/Sounds" was a weak name. Again with the voiceovers point, "Audio" is much more inclusive of all types of cues that could happen during a logo's soundtrack. {{Abbr| |This is more of a personal point, but it does remind me of a Geometry Dash user in which I don't necessarily like.}} [[User:Compooper|Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 00:19, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
 ===Abstain===