Audiovisual Identity Database:Requests for Comment/Music/Sounds section revamp: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "{{subst:RfC Page|Rename "Music/Sounds" to "Audio"|as the title would imply, i am proposing the rename of the "Music/Sounds" section to just "Audio". reasons being: * to me, the Music/Sounds name sounds like very clunky, and the use of the word Sounds makes me think that whoever named that forgot about the word Audio * in a similar manner to the FX rename to Technique, Audio is more concise than Music/Sounds * accounts for other audio in logos. not every logo has Musi...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
today, i've got two proposals to revamp the Music/Sounds section: |
|||
==Rename "Music/Sounds" to "Audio"== |
==Rename "Music/Sounds" to "Audio"== |
||
as the title would imply, i am proposing the rename of the "Music/Sounds" section to just "Audio". |
as the title would imply, i am proposing the rename of the "Music/Sounds" section to just "Audio". |
||
Revision as of 22:19, 4 October 2023
today, i've got two proposals to revamp the Music/Sounds section:
Rename "Music/Sounds" to "Audio"
as the title would imply, i am proposing the rename of the "Music/Sounds" section to just "Audio". reasons being:
- to me, the Music/Sounds name sounds like very clunky, and the use of the word Sounds makes me think that whoever named that forgot about the word Audio
- in a similar manner to the FX rename to Technique, Audio is more concise than Music/Sounds
- accounts for other audio in logos. not every logo has Music or Sounds, e.g. voiceovers
- ties in with the wiki name
Support
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
Section absent in case of no audio
Again, Like the title says, if a logo doesn't have audio, the section is not there instead of just saying None.
Diberhaze (talk) 22:18, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
