Audiovisual Identity Database:Requests for Comment/Make changes to the 2020 WB logo description

The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing with the following resolution:

• Option 1: No consensus
• Option 2: Passed
• Option 3: No consensus
• Option 4: No consensus

VortexArto (talk) 12:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

---

What's this about?

Recently, members of the AVID Discord server have argued as to if the Warner Bros. Pictures logo first seen in TENET should be described with the short version being a main variant. Some believe there should be a more direct and accurate description based on a native version of the logo (one without a variant, this one being the shortened version), whilst others believe the long version only seen in TENET should still be the description, even though a native, unedited version doesn't exist. This didn't end up being resolved, so this is why I am doing an RfC today on a page-specific matter.

So, therefore, I've left three options for you all to decide if the description should stay how it is, or if things should be changed. VPJHuk (talk) 20:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

You know, this is a RfC (Requests for Comment), not the article's talk page, so you should take this over to Talk:Warner Bros. Pictures please. CLGCreator Returns! (talk) 18:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

I literally explained why I made this an RfC. I'll refer to what I said. "Recently, members of the AVID Discord server have argued as to if the Warner Bros. Pictures logo first seen in TENET should be described with the short version being a main variant. This didn't end up being resolved, so this is why I am doing an RfC today on a page-specific matter."

I do thank you for the reminder though :) VPJHuk (talk) 20:49, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

But still, this should go on the article's talk page, not something that should be taken to an RfC. CLGCreator Returns! (talk) 17:26, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Option 1 - Leave the description as is.

This leaves in the long version ONLY seen in TENET as the main description, without any other changes.

Option 2 - Make the short version the main variant of the logo and move the TENET variant completely to Logo Variations

This would make the shortened variant a main description, and move the TENET-only long version into the Logo Variations page, where the variant is already described.

Support

1. Support ForcedExcess26 (talk) 16:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
2. I actually do agree with this topic being better-suited for the company's talk page, but I do Support option 2. Easily the best way to go (especially since Tenet was the lone use of the long version). AUnnamedDragon 12:44 PM, June 30, 2023 (CET)
3. Support per others. · Talk · Edits 19:21, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
4. Support. Regarding AUnnamedDragon's comments, VPJ already attempted to resolve the matter without an RFC, but that did not pan out. Eternity Media Group (talk) 13:04, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Option 3 -- Make the short version the main variant of the logo and mention the long variant in the Variants section.

Same as option 2, but the long version is instead described in the Variants section.

Option 4 -- Other (Comments down below!)

If you have another idea that you want to suggest, please leave it in the comments section.

Comments

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.