AVID:Requests for Comment/Make a version for smartphones and Nintendo Switch: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
#{{Oppose}} per everyone else. Apps on phones or Switch aren't even necessary. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 01:19, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
#{{Oppose}} per everyone else. Apps on phones or Switch aren't even necessary. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 01:19, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
#{{Oppose}} This must be a troll or joke LMAO. I swear to god this is hilarious. How would we port a Mediawiki based website to the damn Nintendo Switch, a console whos internet service costs 20$ a month. I just cant believe you made this. I dont want to sound rude, but seriously, thats how i think of this. [[File:NUGGIE-LOGO.svg|120px|link=User:Nuggie]]
#{{Oppose}} This must be a troll or joke LMAO. I swear to god this is hilarious. How would we port a Mediawiki based website to the damn Nintendo Switch, a console whos internet service costs 20$ a month. I just cant believe you made this. I dont want to sound rude, but seriously, thats how i think of this. [[File:NUGGIE-LOGO.svg|120px|link=User:Nuggie]]
#{{Oppose}}. I'm sorry, but this is probably the single most half-baked rfc this wiki has ever seen. The required skill to develop an app is far beyond what is possible for AVID, and the idea of bringing it to the Nintendo Switch is absolutely preposterous. [[User:Eternity Media Group|Eternity Media Group]] ([[User talk:Eternity Media Group|talk]]) 02:38, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

===Comments===
===Comments===
[[Category:Requests for Comment]]
[[Category:Requests for Comment]]

Revision as of 02:38, 30 September 2023

Make a version for smartphones and Nintendo Switch

I know, but I am out and about and it's tedious editing on my iPhone. So can you make a smartphone app and Nintendo Switch media game?

Support

Abstain

 Abstain I could go for an app, but Nintendo of all people being involved?! No siree! Sonicfan19198282 (talk) 20:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose creating an app/game is out of our league. Logoarto (talk) 17:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
  2. Oppose We're not a video game development company like Nintendo. Camenati (talk) 17:38, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
  3. Oppose I'm out for the same reason as Camenati, as well as the fact that your idea isn't in our league as Logoarto pointed out (plus I doubt Nintendo would do a AVID media game for us). --AUnnamedDragon 2:49 PM, September 29, 2023 (CET)
  4. Oppose Per Others. --User:Pearno|Pearno]] (talk) 2:22 PM, September 29, 2023 (CST)
  5. Oppose just go online. it wouldn't make a differance. (USER TALK!) 22:49, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
  6. Oppose per everyone else. Apps on phones or Switch aren't even necessary. · Talk · Edits 01:19, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
  7. Oppose This must be a troll or joke LMAO. I swear to god this is hilarious. How would we port a Mediawiki based website to the damn Nintendo Switch, a console whos internet service costs 20$ a month. I just cant believe you made this. I dont want to sound rude, but seriously, thats how i think of this.
  8. Oppose. I'm sorry, but this is probably the single most half-baked rfc this wiki has ever seen. The required skill to develop an app is far beyond what is possible for AVID, and the idea of bringing it to the Nintendo Switch is absolutely preposterous. Eternity Media Group (talk) 02:38, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Comments

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.