Audiovisual Identity Database:Requests for Comment/Forbid reputations of companies in Legacy sections and mention in Background instead: Difference between revisions
(I say put it through.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{RFC Draft |
{{RFC Draft |
||
|submit=Yes |
|submit=Yes |
||
|staffreason1={{Approved}}. Explains its purpose, and ticks all the boxes to avoid being invalid. [[User:Eternity Media Group|EMG/Ram (She/They)]] ([[UserTalk:Eternity Media Group|Let's Chat!]]) 22:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
==Forbid reputations of companies in Legacy sections and mention in Background instead== |
==Forbid reputations of companies in Legacy sections and mention in Background instead== |
||
Revision as of 22:45, 28 May 2024
 | This proposal has been submitted for review. If a week has passed and this proposal is still not reviewed, please notify site staff. Please do not vote on the RFC yet, as staff review is ongoing. To add reasoning, use the following parameters "staffreason1" or "staffreason2" Staff member 1: Staff member 2: Last edited by Eternity Media Group (talk | contribs) 40 days ago. (Update) |
Forbid reputations of companies in Legacy sections and mention in Background instead
I created this in response to edits made by MagnabossMaximus. Case in point, legacy sections would only be limited to the impact of the logo and not the company itself. The impact the company receives should be in the Background header as that details the history of that company instead.
As much as reputation of logos get destroyed by companies from terrible people such as The Weinstein Company and Schneider's Bakery, I would personally debate if their Legacy sections would still be around because its main the fault of the company and not the logo.
The tutorials will get an update like this if this RFC passes:
- Avoid adding in the reputation of the company, it may not have anything to do with its logo. Mention it in the Background header instead.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rainbow Puppy
