AVID:Requests for Comment/Forbid reputations of companies in Legacy sections and mention in Background instead: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
RFC now open for voting |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
===Support=== |
===Support=== |
||
#{{Support}} Yeah, mentioning a company's reputation would be a better fit on the background section. |
|||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
Revision as of 22:14, 29 May 2024
Forbid reputations of companies in Legacy sections and mention in Background instead
I created this in response to edits made by MagnabossMaximus. Case in point, legacy sections would only be limited to the impact of the logo and not the company itself. The impact the company receives should be in the Background header as that details the history of that company instead.
As much as reputation of logos get destroyed by companies from terrible people such as The Weinstein Company and Schneider's Bakery, I would personally debate if their Legacy sections would still be around because its main the fault of the company and not the logo.
The tutorials will get an update like this if this RFC passes:
- Avoid adding in the reputation of the company, it may not have anything to do with its logo. Mention it in the Background header instead.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rainbow Puppy
Support
Support Yeah, mentioning a company's reputation would be a better fit on the background section.