Audiovisual Identity Database:Requests for Comment/Forbid reputations of companies in Legacy sections and mention in Background instead: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Latest revision as of 08:33, 6 June 2024

The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as

passed. Camenati (talk) 08:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Forbid reputations of companies in Legacy sections and mention in Background instead

I created this in response to edits made by MagnabossMaximus. Case in point, legacy sections would only be limited to the impact of the logo and not the company itself. The impact the company receives should be in the Background header as that details the history of that company instead.

As much as reputation of logos get destroyed by companies from terrible people such as The Weinstein Company and Schneider's Bakery, I would personally debate if their Legacy sections would still be around because its main the fault of the company and not the logo.

The tutorials will get an update like this if this RFC passes:

Avoid adding in the reputation of the company, it may not have anything to do with its logo. Mention it in the Background header instead.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rainbow Puppy

Support

Support Yeah, mentioning a company's reputation would be a better fit on the background section. · Talk · Edits 22:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Support Per above. Gilby1385 (talk) 22:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Support (TALK•CONTRIBUTIONS) 23:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Support Big support here. Saying this shouldn't even be a proposal, it's straight no- cheating facts. | (lets play football) 03:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Support (話す/hanasu) - no one's around to help. - bob 09:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Support How did I immediately think of TWC and Schnieders before reading the actual details? Also, per everyone else. 18:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Support pretty straight forward. EMG/Ram (She/They) (Let's Chat!) 14:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Support per everyone. As Trevor pointed out, mentioning a company's reputation would fit better on the Background section than on Legacy. --AUnnamedDragon 1:45 PM, June 5, 2024 (CET)

Abstain

Oppose

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{Archive top|Closing as {{approved|passed}}. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 08:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC)}}
 ==Forbid reputations of companies in Legacy sections and mention in Background instead==
 I created this in response to edits made by MagnabossMaximus. Case in point, legacy sections would only be limited to the impact of the logo and not the company itself. The impact the company receives should be in the Background header as that details the history of that company instead.
@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 #{{Support}} How did I immediately think of TWC and Schnieders before reading the actual details? Also, per everyone else. [[File:Squag.jpg|50px|link=User:ThatWiteCat]] 18:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 #{{Support}} pretty straight forward. [[User:Eternity Media Group|EMG/Ram (She/They)]] ([[UserTalk:Eternity Media Group|Let's Chat!]]) 14:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
+#{{Support}} per everyone. As Trevor pointed out, mentioning a company's reputation would fit better on the Background section than on Legacy. --[[User:AUnnamedDragon|AUnnamedDragon]] 1:45 PM, June 5, 2024 (CET)
 ===Abstain===
@@ Line 23: / Line 24: @@
 ===Comments===
 __NOTOC__
+[[Category:RFCs closed in 2024]]
 [[Category:Requests for Comment]]
+{{Archive bottom}}