Audiovisual Identity Database:Requests for Comment/Forbid reputations of companies in Legacy sections and mention in Background instead: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content added Content deleted
(Oops) |
No edit summary |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archive top|Closing as {{approved|passed}}. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 08:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
==Forbid reputations of companies in Legacy sections and mention in Background instead== |
==Forbid reputations of companies in Legacy sections and mention in Background instead== |
||
I created this in response to edits made by MagnabossMaximus. Case in point, legacy sections would only be limited to the impact of the logo and not the company itself. The impact the company receives should be in the Background header as that details the history of that company instead. |
I created this in response to edits made by MagnabossMaximus. Case in point, legacy sections would only be limited to the impact of the logo and not the company itself. The impact the company receives should be in the Background header as that details the history of that company instead. |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
===Support=== |
===Support=== |
||
#{{Support}} Yeah, mentioning a company's reputation would be a better fit on the background section. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 22:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC) |
#{{Support}} Yeah, mentioning a company's reputation would be a better fit on the background section. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 22:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
#{{Support}} Per above. [[User:Gilby1385|Gilby1385]] ([[User talk:Gilby1385|talk]]) 22:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
#{{Support}} [[File:E12349 Signature.png|150px|link=User:Eliternal12349]] ('''[[User talk:Eliternal12349|TALK]]•[[Special:Contributions/Eliternal12349|CONTRIBUTIONS]]''') 23:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
#{{Support}} Big support here. Saying this shouldn't even be a proposal, it's straight no- cheating facts. [[File:TVB-12-3-2023.png|50px|link=User:TVB]] | ([[User talk:TVB|lets play football]]) 03:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
#{{Support}} [[File:Phbsignature.png|60px|link=User:NotPurpleHoodieBoi]] <span style="color:purple">([[User talk:NotPurpleHoodieBoi|''話す/hanasu'']])</span> - <span style="font-size: 80%;"><span style="font-family:'Arial Narrow';">no one's around to help. - bob</span></span> 09:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
#{{Support}} How did I immediately think of TWC and Schnieders before reading the actual details? Also, per everyone else. [[File:Squag.jpg|50px|link=User:ThatWiteCat]] 18:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
#{{Support}} pretty straight forward. [[User:Eternity Media Group|EMG/Ram (She/They)]] ([[UserTalk:Eternity Media Group|Let's Chat!]]) 14:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
#{{Support}} per everyone. As Trevor pointed out, mentioning a company's reputation would fit better on the Background section than on Legacy. --[[User:AUnnamedDragon|AUnnamedDragon]] 1:45 PM, June 5, 2024 (CET) |
|||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
| Line 17: | Line 24: | ||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
__NOTOC__ |
__NOTOC__ |
||
[[Category:RFCs closed in 2024]] |
|||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
||
{{Archive bottom}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 08:33, 6 June 2024
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Forbid reputations of companies in Legacy sections and mention in Background instead
I created this in response to edits made by MagnabossMaximus. Case in point, legacy sections would only be limited to the impact of the logo and not the company itself. The impact the company receives should be in the Background header as that details the history of that company instead.
As much as reputation of logos get destroyed by companies from terrible people such as The Weinstein Company and Schneider's Bakery, I would personally debate if their Legacy sections would still be around because its main the fault of the company and not the logo.
The tutorials will get an update like this if this RFC passes:
- Avoid adding in the reputation of the company, it may not have anything to do with its logo. Mention it in the Background header instead.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rainbow Puppy
Support
Support Yeah, mentioning a company's reputation would be a better fit on the background section. 
· Talk · Edits 22:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)- Support Per above. Gilby1385 (talk) 22:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support
(TALK•CONTRIBUTIONS) 23:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC) - Support Big support here. Saying this shouldn't even be a proposal, it's straight no- cheating facts.
| (lets play football) 03:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC) - Support
(話す/hanasu) - no one's around to help. - bob 09:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC) - Support How did I immediately think of TWC and Schnieders before reading the actual details? Also, per everyone else.
18:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC) - Support pretty straight forward. EMG/Ram (She/They) (Let's Chat!) 14:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support per everyone. As Trevor pointed out, mentioning a company's reputation would fit better on the Background section than on Legacy. --AUnnamedDragon 1:45 PM, June 5, 2024 (CET)
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
