Audiovisual Identity Database:Requests for Comment/Feature color links for Administrators and Bureaucrats: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Archive top|Closing as {{Rejected|failed}} [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 09:17, 17 November 2023 (UTC)}}
==Feature color links for Administrators and Bureaucrats==
==Feature color links for Administrators and Bureaucrats==
I see a problem with AVID. It seems that I actually don't recognize the user and whose roles easily. I think it would be better if we have Administrators, Bureaucrats, and Moderators have their own color links. Here are the codes for [[MediaWiki:common.css]]:
I see a problem with AVID. It seems that I actually don't recognize the user and whose roles easily. I think it would be better if we have Administrators, Bureaucrats, and Moderators have their own color links. Here are the codes for [[MediaWiki:common.css]]:
Line 61: Line 62:


===Support===
===Support===

#{{Support}} [[File:E12349 Signature.png|150px|link=User:Eliternal12349]] ('''[[User talk:Eliternal12349|TALK]]•[[Special:Contributions/Eliternal12349|CONTRIBUTIONS]]''') 17:13, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
===Abstain===
===Abstain===
#{{Abstain}} doesnt sound too bad, but isnt really needed. [[File:Charlie_signature_AVID.png|200px|link=User:Charlie Fiddlesticks]] ([[User talk:Charlie Fiddlesticks|• '''USER TALK!''' •]]) 23:09, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
#{{Abstain}} Same with what Charlie said [[User:TVB|𝓘𝓝ℱ𝓔ℛ𝓝𝓞 𝓞ℱ 𝑇.𝓥.ℬ.]] ([[User talk:TVB|chat is this real????]]) 21:27, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
#{{Abstain}} per above [[File:Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg|link=User:Sickminecraft45]] [[User_talk:Sickminecraft45| ('''''Talk to Me!''''')]] 13:25, 14 November 2023 (UTC)


===Oppose===
===Oppose===
#{{Oppose}} Not a bad idea, but a color link for admins and bureaucrats may not work all the time, especially when taking into account custom signatures. If there is another alternative to this proposal, I'll gladly change my vote. Additionally, leaving out moderators out of the equation wouldn't seem fair, considering they still have administrative powers and should be recognized for that alongside other staff members. That also goes against the goal of recognizing what role a user has. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 17:17, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
#{{Oppose}} Not a bad idea, but a color link for admins and bureaucrats may not work all the time, especially when taking into account custom signatures. If there is another alternative to this proposal, I'll gladly change my vote. Additionally, leaving out moderators out of the equation wouldn't seem fair, considering they still have administrative powers and should be recognized for that alongside other staff members. That also goes against the goal of recognizing what role a user has. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 17:17, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
#:Did you look at Encyclopedia SpongeBobia? Go to ESB:Crew and see that the user links actually work. Don't forget to search MediaWiki:common.css in that website and look until you see that there is a code that I got and edited it. PS, I added the color codes for Moderators and fixed some issues. [[File:E12349 Signature.png|150px|link=User:Eliternal12349]] ('''[[User talk:Eliternal12349|TALK]]•[[Special:Contributions/Eliternal12349|CONTRIBUTIONS]]''') 18:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
#:Did you look at Encyclopedia SpongeBobia? Go to ESB:Crew and see that the user links actually work. Don't forget to search MediaWiki:common.css in that website and look until you see that there is a code that I got and edited it. PS, I added the color codes for Moderators and fixed some issues. [[File:E12349 Signature.png|150px|link=User:Eliternal12349]] ('''[[User talk:Eliternal12349|TALK]]•[[Special:Contributions/Eliternal12349|CONTRIBUTIONS]]''') 18:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
#::I was referring to custom signatures like yours, Nova, Tabit, and Trevor. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 18:08, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
===Comments===
#:::I think you can still keep your custom signatures like that. Look at the templates of admins and bureaucrats in ESB and there it is custom without having the colorized link. [[File:E12349 Signature.png|150px|link=User:Eliternal12349]] ('''[[User talk:Eliternal12349|TALK]]•[[Special:Contributions/Eliternal12349|CONTRIBUTIONS]]''') 18:10, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
#{{Oppose}} per Camenati. Also, just a reminder, you can't support your own RfC. [[User:Sonicfan19198282|Sonicfan19198282]] ([[User talk:Sonicfan19198282|talk]]) 18:17, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
#:Yes, you can. --[[User:Raidarr|Raidarr]] ([[User talk:Raidarr|talk]]) 21:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
#{{Oppose}} per Camenati. I'd also argue that this isn't necessarily worthy of an rfc, but rather should have been a forum post instead. [[User:Eternity Media Group|Eternity Media Group]] ([[User talk:Eternity Media Group|talk]]) 10:25, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
#{{Oppose}} per others. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 08:08, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


===Comments===
I agree this should be a forum post rather than an RFC. That said, I wouldn't be opposed to this idea and while I understand the concerns around custom sigs, remember - we all have user links on our forum posts. If nowhere else, this would be a neat little aesthetic update in that area. For the sake of consistency, I'd also prefer to see the color choices aligned to the role colors on the Discord server (AVID red for the Bureaucrats, AVID blue for the admins and AVID green for the mods). [[File:sig.png|100px|link=User:Hb1290]] '''''[[User talk:Hb1290|Talk]]'''''&nbsp;<b>·</b>&#32;'''''[[Special:Contributions/Hb1290|Edits]]''''' 10:50, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
[[Category:Requests for Comment]]
[[Category:Requests for Comment]]
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{Archive bottom}}

Latest revision as of 09:17, 17 November 2023


Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.