Audiovisual Identity Database:Requests for Comment/Change Music/Sounds to Music/SFX: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
(→‎Comments: Reply)
Line 15: Line 15:
===Comments===
===Comments===
# {{Comment}} Request SNOW closure because this thing previously failed, as proved by Camenati. [[User:IAmThe789Guy|IAmThe789Guy]] ([[User talk:IAmThe789Guy|talk]]) 20:35, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{Comment}} Request SNOW closure because this thing previously failed, as proved by Camenati. [[User:IAmThe789Guy|IAmThe789Guy]] ([[User talk:IAmThe789Guy|talk]]) 20:35, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
#:Speedy Closure as its a re-proposal of an RFC that has failed quite recently [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 15:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
[[Category:Requests for Comment]]
[[Category:Requests for Comment]]
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__

Revision as of 15:28, 7 February 2023

Music/Sounds to Music/SFX

Well, I really need your help. Someone must change Music/Sounds to Music/SFX. Change it.

The reason why is because it's pretty much old now. For now, someone must change it. DSG Entertainment! (Ha ha ha! Talk section!) 21:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Support

Abstain

Oppose

  1. Oppose No offense, but are you that desperate to rename the section where you proposed it again with literally the same "reasons" as the previous one? C̴̣̳̟͇̳͓̀̆̿Ā̸̛̛̝͎̗̲̯̲̰͠M̷̢̯̗̱͎̗̰̈̌̎͜E̶͖̪̽̓͒N̵̗̘̩͇̫̭̤̙̈́̑͜A̸̼̫̯̮̼̟̲̫̲̍̈́̐͑̑̓̎̀̎̍̀͜T̵̡̨̧̪̼͓̜͉͇͎́I̵̧͍̥̗͕͐ͅ 20:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
    M'kay, you're back with a reason and...it's not a good one. It still feels like "change for the sake of change" and that same argument can be applied to multiple other aspects of the page such as "Logo" and "Availability". But why this one in particular? C̴̣̳̟͇̳͓̀̆̿Ā̸̛̛̝͎̗̲̯̲̰͠M̷̢̯̗̱͎̗̰̈̌̎͜E̶͖̪̽̓͒N̵̗̘̩͇̫̭̤̙̈́̑͜A̸̼̫̯̮̼̟̲̫̲̍̈́̐͑̑̓̎̀̎̍̀͜T̵̡̨̧̪̼͓̜͉͇͎́I̵̧͍̥̗͕͐ͅ 20:35, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  2. Oppose You still didn't give the reason why we should change it. Cattotld (talk) 20:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  3. Oppose There is nothing wrong with the section the way it is Luke2505 (talk) 20:34, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments

  1.  Comment: Request SNOW closure because this thing previously failed, as proved by Camenati. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 20:35, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
    Speedy Closure as its a re-proposal of an RFC that has failed quite recently (Lets chat!) 15:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.