Audiovisual Identity Database:Requests for Comment/Bring back the "AVID Remembers" section in homepage

"AVID Remembers" subpage

I find it disrespectful that you got rid of the CLG Wiki's dedication subpage. Bring it back, but under the new name.

1. Support (The Third Place) 10:44, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

# Support · Talk · Edits 10:52, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

1. Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 11:09, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
2. Support I don't know why it was removed in the first place. (name change coming soon) 13:07, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
3. Support What was the point of removing it? Because of CLG Wiki? No way! (• USER TALK! •) 14:15, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Oppose Why?? It has absolutely nothing to do with the wiki's purpose. It's a nice gesture and all but it doesn't belong here. NancerAVID 17:43, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
2. Oppose This is one of the very few things I agree with the old BoD on. This and Anniversaries were filler that was ultimately irrelevant to our site and it’s contents, and now that we’ve added more navigation options and other sections such as Featured Images and the Recent Changes feed, such filler is no longer necessary given our homepage now has much more relevant content and functionality than when these sections were originally in use. Talk · Edits 01:45, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
3. Oppose in the world Per everyone Compooper 01:48, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
4. Oppose As stated by the others, it became un-needed on the homepage of the Wiki. Instead, we have a memorial section dedicated to remembering those who have passed on in our Discord server. This is a much more fitting place for it, in my opinion. Luke2505 (talk) 01:53, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
5. Oppose I never saw a need for that section even when we were CLG wiki. It's not needed in a place that's meant to be mainly about logos. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 02:22, 10 December 2022 (UTC) IAmThe789Guy
6. Oppose While it may be disrespectful, there isn't that much of a point to this section, neither the anniversary pages, considering this is a wiki about logos. There would not be a lot of people who would visit this site to mourn the deaths of individuals or celebrate the 5th anniversary of a TV show. Camenati (talk) 02:26, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
7. Oppose As per everyone else. · Talk · Edits 04:04, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

   Wait what? You went from strongest support to strongest oppose? Why? You already had an opinion, stand by it. NancerAVID (talk) 16:22, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

   Welcome to the whole reason people change votes. (• USER TALK! •) 18:44, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

   there's this thing called changing your mind based on other arguments, Nancer. I'd recommend looking into it at some point. (name change coming soon) 04:24, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

   I once thought Michael Davies was a great showrunner for Jeopardy! just because the guy he replaced was a manipulative scumbag who Leno-ed himself into the hosting gig. Then the one-two-three punch of the Brian Laundrie clue on a primetime Celebrity Jeopardy! episode, that Bible Final Jeopardy! clue (on a ToC final, no less!), and his response to the criticism on the Inside Jeopardy! podcast (on top of him failing to address the Laundrie clue, which I consider the single worst clue in the show's history) changed my mind on his producing. Basically, this new thing called changing your mind after realizing you may have had an unfounded opinion. · Talk · Edits 05:32, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

8. Oppose It was filler that wasted a lot of peoples time. --Shakla (talk) 03:40, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
9. Oppose although i understand why you say this, we already have a channel for it on the discord server. tmsl (talk) 23:50, 11 December 2022 (UTC)