Audiovisual Identity Database:Featured Media Nominations/Archive 1
February 2023
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Disney_channel_on_demand_logo.jpg
Reason: Maybe rare?
Support
Oppose
Oppose It has a watermark and even then, I'm not sure this is particularly rare. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 23:53, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per AlmightyKingPrawn and Eliternal12349
(Talk to Me!) 16:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose SnowflakesOmega (talk) 18:31, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
File:Disney_Channel.jpg
Reason: Probably rare
Support
Oppose
- Oppose, especially if it's labelled "Very common" and not something highly unusual. Camenati (talk) 22:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 23:43, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. I'm sorry, but this is too common to be featured here. Dominicmgm (talk) 23:51, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose and smarten up
(Talk/Edits) 00:39, 27 January 2023 (UTC) - Oppose As per above (Talk to Me!) 16:48, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose SnowflakesOmega (talk) 18:31, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose It looks so common that I will easily gonna find it somewhere. User:Luli Logo (Talk "coming soon") January 29, 2023 19:14 (UTC)
Comments
FEATURE PLZ
Support
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
File:Sesame Workshop (2008) (Spanish).jpg
_(Spanish).jpg)
Reason: Rare Spanish variant of the early 2000s Sesame Workshop logo. Wasn't even documented on our page until I added it. 
Talk · Edits 11:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 14:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 14:40, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Support 
· Talk · Edits 15:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Support 
(Talk to Me!) 16:49, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose Not an interesting or significant find, considering this is a basic multilingual variant that simply translates the bottom text to the show's language. I have seen rarer and stranger international variants than this. Camenati (talk) 16:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Per Camenati 
(• USER TALK! •) 20:40, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose SnowflakesOmega (talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Central - Carlton Country ident (1999)
Reason: This is Central's version of the Carlton Country ident. It used to be a lost ident until I found a 16:9 squeezed capture from a promo on TV Ark, then it has been found by Daniel Mullins on January 7, 2022. SonicFan08MZ (talk) 21:45, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support and just in time for the Carlton IDs getting their Lost Media Wiki page too! AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 23:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Support · Talk · Edits 11:05, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Support (Talk/Edits) 16:57, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
20th Century Fox (1993-Studio Productions).png
.png)
Reason: a Brief clip of this logo was in a 1997 documentary (played in reverse) but wasn't noticed or even know about (the later prototype, from 1994 was known about since someone managed to dig up a Flip Your Lid demo reel in the early-mid 2010s) until mid 2020-early 2021, also in Mid 2020, The full animation was in a Image Savant demo reel from October 22, 1993 posted on archive.org, but was unnoticed until Late December 2022, and since this is a logo from a well known company with tons of popularity, so... TheToonsOfJosh (talk) 14:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support · Talk · Edits 19:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Support BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 11:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Support (Talk/Edits) 16:57, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Turner Pictures (1994, Israel).png
.png)
Reason: This is a green-tinted, squeezed Israeli variant found on a trailer for Andre. As far as I know, this is the only known capture of it.
Support
Support · Talk · Edits 11:07, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Support (Talk/Edits) 16:57, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
THX(Broadway, Spanish, 1997).jpg
.jpg)
Reason: This significant discovery marked the first (and probably the only) time that THX had a localized version in any of its logos. This was regarded as the rarest THX find alongside the long lost-and-found Cimarron music variant. VPJHuk (talk) 13:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 16:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Support · Talk · Edits 11:07, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Support (Talk/Edits) 16:57, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 12:11, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
BuenaVista101DalmatiansPrototype.jpeg
Reason: An unused prototype logo that was originally gonna be used for the 1961 Disney film, One Hundred and One Dalmatians, but ended up scrapped. Surprised this has not got any recognition yet, so why not nominate it? BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 19:36, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support 
(The Third Place) 19:40, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Support AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 23:31, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Support · Talk · Edits 02:31, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Support (Talk/Edits) 16:57, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
File:Nikkatsu_(1925).jpeg
.jpeg)
Reason: For the longest time, many people thought the first Nikkatsu logo is the one with bird (turns out that was actually a logo for Nikkatsu-Banno). Last year however, I have discovered what's possibly the oldest Nikkatsu logo, on the film Furusato no Uta, dated 1925. It contains a very early version of the NK emblem.
Support
Support Definitely a great choice. · Talk · Edits 17:16, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Support AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 23:31, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 12:11, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Support (Talk/Edits) 16:57, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Support SnowflakesOmega (talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Bravo_VMT.png
Reason: Up until 2022, the 2010 Bravo logo had only one known source on Sun Sea and A&E. In the last few months, I have found brand new variants of this logo, including this one from "Brit Cops". Up until this point, it was thought that all logos from the 2010 rebrands of Living and Bravo replaced the Virgin Media Television logo with a Living TV Group copyright notice, so this find was very unexpected. This particular variant was only spotted on one episode of the series, with the rest using Living TV Group notices, making it even rarer. Luke2505 (talk) 16:56, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support It certainly fits well. · Talk · Edits 16:58, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
Comment: RIP Bravo, gone for over a decade. Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 18:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
20th Century Fox Logo (1953; Fullscreen).jpg
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
- Closing as invalid due to this image having been discovered to be a fan-made open-matte edit, likely submitted without the approval of its creator. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 02:45, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Reason: A rarity that has just shown up on the wiki and TCS page! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 08:16, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support (Talk/Edits) 16:58, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose Fanmade creation made by someone on DeviantArt. "Link" 
(Metronome) 21:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- If that's the case, then Oppose. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 22:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- Then how did it get here for being fake? Sickminecraft45 (talk) 20:45, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
File:20th Century Fox Telecommunications (1983) (From - The Who Rocks America).png
_(From_-_The_Who_Rocks_America).png)
Reason: This Fox logo has only been seen on a Who Rocks America special, some random show that doesn't air anymore, not even on Me TV. I don't know how you can find this, but on here it says 'ultra rare', so there must be a way. Also, what is Profile Publishing & Management Corps. A.P.S.? Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 18:50, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support VPJHuk (talk) 19:23, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Support I have never seen this logo before or knew about it's existence! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 20:34, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Support · Talk · Edits 17:00, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Support (Talk/Edits) 16:58, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The weird soviet Toei logos
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
.jpg)
Reason: Just like with Rank, Toei also got quite the amount of Soviet variants. All of them are weird and funny, which is why I decided to submit them here. Davidthelogohunter (talk) 02:42, 12 January 2023 (GMT+4)
Support
Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 12:34, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Support Some logos that I have never seen before that are worthy of being featured! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 04:27, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Support · Talk · Edits 16:59, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Support (Talk/Edits) 16:59, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
A bunch of soviet "Gongmans"
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=icon}
.jpg){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
.jpg){kind=icon}
Reason: The Rank Organisation was no strange to having their famous "Gongman" localised for international audiences. But it seems really weird that the country that got the most variants was the USSR. Davidthelogohunter (talk) 02:32, 12 January 2023 (GMT+4)
Support
Support Ok logos that may be worthy of getting featured. Sickminecraft45 (talk) 04:28, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Support · Talk · Edits 17:00, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Support My German Rank got featured, I don't see why these Soviet versions can't. VPJHuk (talk) 11:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Support (Talk/Edits) 16:59, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 12:14, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Support IAmThe789Guy (talk) 22:01, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Universal Music Limited (2007)
.jpg)
Reason: An obscure logo for an obscure branch. Davidthelogohunter (talk) 01:24, 12 January 2023 (GMT+4)
Support
Support Neat. (• USER TALK! •) 01:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- May I suggest using a different Gif that isnt so big?
(Lets chat!) 01:39, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- I knew someone was gonna say that. (• USER TALK! •) 02:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Done 
(• USER TALK! •) 02:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- I knew someone was gonna say that.
Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 12:34, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Support · Talk · Edits 17:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Support (Talk/Edits) 16:59, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Sony Pictures (2009)
.png)
Reason: A rare previously unnoticed Sony logo only used in Brazil. Davidthelogohunter (talk) 01:08, 12 January 2023 (GMT+4)
Support
- Support Contrary to what Charlie and Sickminecraft45 say, I believe this logo fits the criteria, given that it actually is rare. It's not T.A.T.-level rare, but it's not unworthy of or undeserving to be a Featured Image. · Talk · Edits 15:58, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Absolute gem of a discovery. Very rightfully deserves a place on the featured images section. Luke2505 (talk) 16:50, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Really good discovery in my opinion. The fact that people are abstaining/opposing this just because "it isn't worthy" or the fact that it's been there for months is just absurd. I and multiple others have posted finds that haven't been featured for one reason or another for months AND EVEN YEARS. That shouldn't change how a rare logo is portrayed. A new rare find will get old at some point, but it can still be considered rare unless more and more discoveries of said rare logo is found. Enough of my rant, I'll have my support. VPJHuk (talk) 10:50, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support now that there is a video and I can tell just how rare it is. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 18:54, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Abstain
Abstain I don't know here. It is significant given Sony, but not so good on the RARE end of the stick given being seen for at least over 3 months. 
(• USER TALK! •) 22:25, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Abstain I don't think this logo is worthy enough. Sickminecraft45 (talk) 04:34, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- Charlie, you didn't seem to say anything similar regarding other images you supported that've been seen for longer than three months (Paramount/Disney, textless Paramount, T.A.T., Warner Music Video).
- Also, Sickminecraft45, what is your rationale? I mean, this isn't a variant of the SPT logo. · Talk · Edits 06:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Why should I? (• USER TALK! •) 16:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Actually, I voted those ones because of where you have to find them and their sources. Sometimes the logo can be used for years and only be seen on one source, hence Disney Paramount. TAT on the other hand I voted due to it's extreme find because of plastering (• USER TALK! •) 17:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Here's a video of this logo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhE2eW4jV4g
- That should prove conclusively that this isn't just a variant of the SPT logo. · Talk · Edits 17:24, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Actually, I voted those ones because of where you have to find them and their sources. Sometimes the logo can be used for years and only be seen on one source, hence Disney Paramount. TAT on the other hand I voted due to it's extreme find because of plastering
- Why should I?
Oppose
Comments
- So I myself decided to do one last thing before I close this drama for good.
- Sometimes, just learn to do research.
- I logo hunt 24/7.
- I don't take breaks.
- And just when you found smth special, some randos show up and call your find not worthy, just because it reminds them of the TV logo of the same company.
- That is disrespectful.
- Not just to me, but also other logo hunters too.
- This must be the last time a logo hunters' effort gets mashed into the ground.
- As for people who supported it, thank you all very much.
- I really appriciate it.
- And with that, I'm out.
Davidthelogohhnter (talk) 01:28, 22 January 2023 (GMT+4)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Paramount_Pictures-Walt_Disney_Productions_(1980).jpg
.jpg)
Reason: The fact that it was highly obscure until it was found in (I believe) 2022, as well as the fact that both a Disney and Paramount logo are on-screen at the same time, which is very rare occurence. --RobowilOFFICIAL (talk) 04:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
- Support When this was first found, my jaw dropped. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 05:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support I would like to see this nominated considering that outside of this (and Miramax stuff), the only times I've seen Disney interact with other Paramount is with Marvel's The Avengers and Iron Man 3.... Snorunt (talk) 07:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support This was a lost logo for a while, and it's really good to see this being found. If automatic features were a thing, I would expect finds that used to be lost there, with this being one of them. VPJHuk (talk) 10:46, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support (The Third Place) 12:40, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Compooper (talk) 12:43, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support (Talk/Edits) 15:31, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support These two just make a good pair (• USER TALK! •) 15:41, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support SnowflakesOmega (talk) 01:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 12:34, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Very cool logo that I would love to be featured! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 04:29, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support · Talk · Edits 17:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Viacom Community Access Northshore (1988).jpeg
.jpeg)
Reason: This version of the V of Steel is very odd, as it has not only a cheap text, but also has the mark of it's community Cable TV division, one which isn't talked about much. In that sense, not only it's rare, but its an interesting piece of history of a significant television-related company.
Support
Support It's kinda sad that Featured Image Nominations might actually replace Surprise Logo Discoveries in terms of activity and images. Anyways, this is a neat find. (• USER TALK! •) 19:58, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- To be fair, this is a new thing and probably will quiet down as time goes, but this helped out the fact that the Featured Images page was quite dry with new things (simply because nobody bothered to put any new things in the thread as well as the administrators usually ignoring the thread when it came to Featured images, unfortunately).
- Essentially, this page saved the Featured Images, in my opinion. VPJHuk (talk) 10:50, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 12:34, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Support A very good and rare logo! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 04:31, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Nikkatsu Corporation (1998 - Ayane's High Kick - Central Park Media print).png
.png)
Reason: This is kind of an obscure discovery, it was initially discovered in 2020, and was only added to AVID 2 years later.
Nova (talk) (Logo not final) 16:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
- Support Maybe? Sickminecraft45 (talk) 07:28, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Paramount Pictures (Textless, 1967).png
.png)
Reason: This is the 6th logo from Paramount Pictures, but one big key difference is that this is possibly the only variant that doesn't contain any text whatsoever. 
(Discussion area ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 12:36, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support Holy piez (• USER TALK! •) 16:42, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Support I recall this being featured in the original Wikifoundry CLG Wiki, and with other WF features retaining their feature, I think this should too. Otherwise, this is a pretty intriguing and rare find. VPJHuk (talk) 19:19, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Support The coolest find you ever done. WOW! (Talk/Edits) 20:06, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Support as the guy who found out what movie this came from (The Third Place) 12:55, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 12:34, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Support This has to be featured! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 07:31, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Support per everyone else. · Talk · Edits 17:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Warner Music Video (1985).jpg
.jpg)
Reason: This music logo is another 'no chance of finding' logo by WB. Also, why is the text English, when the logo is exclusive to a Japanese tape? Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 17:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support The blue looks good on the Big W (• USER TALK! •) 16:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Support This rarity has to be featured! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 07:32, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Support · Talk · Edits 17:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
DCUnusedFrame2005.jpg
Reason: This is a frame of an unused DC Entertainment logo I found on the 2005 Imaginary Forces website via the Wayback Machine. There were other style frames, but they are all broken links so this is the only surviving one. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 18:59, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support (The Third Place) 19:28, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Support (Talk/Edits) 15:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Support · Talk · Edits 17:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Hanna Barbera Poland and P.P. Polskie Nagrania (1988) (From - Polish Magila Gorila VHS).png
_(From_-_Polish_Magila_Gorila_VHS).png)
Reason: Hanna-Barbera, a world-famous production company, responsible for Yogi Bear, Scooby-Doo, Dexter's Lab, Top Cat etc. teams up with P.P. Polskie Nagrania, a random obscure Polish record company with absolutely nothing to do with cartoons. Wut? Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 16:09, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Oppose
Oppose Not really rare as this logo has been uploaded numerous times. And not really significant, due to the fact that besides the relation to HB, not much is known about this company. (• USER TALK! •) 18:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose for the same reasons (name change coming soon) 18:09, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Per CharlieFiddlesticks. (Talk/Edits) 15:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Wbdptvcnf.png
Reason: This is one of (if not) the rarest logo WB has pulled out. It has only been found on 2 sources, and if you try to look for it outside of YouTube, don't bother. Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 15:26, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Oppose
Comments
Comment: It is already featured. (• USER TALK! •) 15:50, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- OK. Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 16:00, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
File:Spiffy Pictures Website Prototype Logo.png
Reason: This was discovered not too long ago and for a while people just thought it was fake due to the fan made on screen logo. Thanks to the discovery and the significance of Spiffy Pictures in the logo community, it is safe to say that this deserves a spot in the features due to being a prototype and the significance of the logo on the AVID wiki and the logo community in general. (• USER TALK! •) 03:25, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
- Support while i don't exactly do rare finds (the one logo find i have on my youtube channel is the 2018 fremantle logo) im down for this (The Third Place) 04:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Support Good find! AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 19:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Support That reason is really important. (Talk/Edits) 15:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Screenshot_2021-02-26_at_9.22.19_AM.png
Reason: This underrated brand needs to be recognized again, especially for Flying Rhino Junior High fans.
Support
Oppose
Oppose Not a rare or significant logo. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 19:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose (Talk/Edits) 15:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose SnowflakesOmega (talk) 18:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Comments
I really doubt your nomination User:Luli Logo (Talk) January 8, 2023 23:40 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Mark V International logo.jpg
Reason: It's the rarest find I ever uploaded to this wiki. Also the source where I extracted it is rare too (Peppermint Park to be more exact). Luli Logo (talk) 19:32, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
- Support Peppermint Park needs a remake. It deserves more love, and a remake should give it that love. -HavocMan2000, 2:45 PM, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
January 2023
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Amblin1983.webp
Reason: Rare prototype Amblin Entertainment logo (The Third Place) 13:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support. What a fantastic find! Dominicmgm (talk) 14:41, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Support This wins my vote because Amblin made Animaniacs (• USER TALK! •) 15:09, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Let's not forget WB's role in it. They distributed the show and aired it on Kids WB, Cartoon Network, Boomerang and Nickelodeon (for some reason). Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 15:20, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- and Fox Kids (• USER TALK! •) 15:55, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- and Fox Kids
Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 12:26, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose because according to this article, it is not an on-screen logo but a door sign.
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2016/10/09/alibaba-pictures-amblin-to-co-produce-films-for-global-chinese-audience.html --Axel (talk) 23:40, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Crap (The Third Place) 23:53, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- It's still cool so I support (• USER TALK! •) 23:58, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I've seen this logo before you requested it; i've seen it in Logopedia, a wiki in Fandom. (Talk/Edits) 15:41, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Two Soups Productions early logo.jpeg
Reason: It turns out that the logo with those kids was not the only logo they had. This was found back on September 29 last year. I was on YouTube finding full episodes of long gone shows and one of these was Teachers (2006, NBC). The videos I found of that show mostly cut off the credits (which were original airings), but one of them actually showed a partial logo combo (meaning it cut off NBC Studios), which is how I got this capture. SuperMax124 (talk) 13:26, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support Now that's rare indeed! Doctorine Dark (talk) 13:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Support AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 19:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
File:Jerry Bruckheimer Films (Kangaroo Jack, Theatrical A).jpg and File:Jerry Bruckheimer Films (Kangaroo Jack, Theatrical B).jpg
.jpg)
.jpg)
Reason: This was actually found by someone on Twitter, but video has since been deleted and only these images exist.
Support
- Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 11:22, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 19:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Agreed. (Talk/Edits) 15:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support · Talk · Edits 17:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
- What rare about this? Thesquidgeeks (talk) 8:31, January 7, 2023 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
File:Rare nick turkey logo.png
Reason: This logo was seen on only one source and has a byline of 1989. Because of this, this is the true first Nickelodeon Productions logo
(• USER TALK! •) 20:22, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support This is surprisingly fascinating to see! I never expected a logo even EARLIER than the haypile. This is the definition of an underrated gem of a discovery. VinegarPop (talk) 20:28, January 6, 2023 (UTC)
Support SnowflakesOmega (talk) 23:09, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Per VinegarPop. Doctorine Dark (talk) 11:25, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Support since Frank Zappa dropped Sheik Yerbouti in 1979. (The Third Place) 13:39, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- In 1979 Columbia Pictures had it's (in my opinion) best logo; The Sunburst. (• USER TALK! •) 20:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Support Logohub (talk) 14:35, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Support (Talk/Edits) 15:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Support A very suprising find to me considering that most Nickelodeon logos I know of are from 1991 and onward. So a Nickelodeon logo (with MTV mentioned as opposed to no byline) is a pretty neat find! Snorunt (talk) 21:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Support · Talk · Edits 17:08, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
WNET New York (1982 - Great Performances).png
.png)
Reason: Notable discovery due to having no footage until last month.Nova (talk) (Logo not final) 19:29, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support holy twilight sparkle (The Third Place) 21:21, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Support Cool find (• USER TALK! •) 21:51, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Support Finally after all these years, one lost media less. User:Luli Logo (Talk)
Support Holy crap. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 19:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Support (Talk/Edits) 15:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Support · Talk · Edits 17:08, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
WBITV (AOL Byline and Extended, 2000s).png
.png)
Reason: This logo by itself is extremely rare, but it having the AOL byline? That is next level. This is also significant company-wise, as it's something from Warner Bros. VPJHuk (talk) 19:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
- Support Nice (• USER TALK! •) 00:39, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose I think the one I've nominated is just a bit rarer. Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 15:30, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
I don't see it as a competition though. Your nomination is pretty good too, but it shouldn't be a factor as to why another should be opposed VPJHuk (talk) 10:57, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- No it's not. VPJHuk's is better in my opinion. Sorry (• USER TALK! •) 16:36, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Krad016.jpg
Reason: This Is an Unused CBC logo from 1974 and This is the only image we have of it.
(My Talk Page) 17:33, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support (The Third Place) 18:45, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Support Per Doctorine Dark. Some people just vote because of rarity.
Support This find is awesome. Now I'm wondering, how this picture look like as a video logo? User:Luli Logo (User talk:Luli Logo) January 7, 2023 19:23 (UTC)
Support Even though I know next to nothing about CBC, this looks like a pretty cool find and CBC is significant enough (• USER TALK! •) 15:54, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Support AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 19:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Support (Talk/Edits) 15:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Support · Talk · Edits 17:09, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
- Oppose This seems like it would've been very hard to find, sure. But the impact this had on the community was almost nothing. We have a whole lot of lost logos still being found. And with that amount of busy people, nobody seems to care about this one. VinegarPop (talk) 17:41, January 6, 2023 (UTC)
- But it's not about the significance of the logo. It's about its rarity. Doctorine Dark (talk) 18:02, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
rede globo 2000 logo
.jpg)
Reason: this logo looks great, doesn't it?
Support
Oppose
Oppose As Logohub said about Touchstone Home Video, this isn't really significant enough to warrant a feature. (name change coming soon) 16:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Not significant. SnowflakesOmega (talk) 23:10, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Doctorine Dark (talk) 11:29, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
disney logo 2006
Reason: nothing can't beat the iconic castle
Support
Support only because of how iconic it is. Also your formatting is disgusting. (name change coming soon) 16:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose simply because it's nothing significant. While yes, it's an iconic logo, that's all the value it has for the normal version (which you seem to have posted). VPJHuk (talk) 16:55, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I don't get what is rare or significant about this. It is just the Disney logo. (• USER TALK! •) 18:47, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose C'mon, everyone already knows this. SnowflakesOmega (talk) 23:10, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Too common a logo. Dominicmgm (talk) 11:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I know it's an iconic logo, but definitely not feature-worthy since it's almost everywhere. (Discussion area ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 11:25, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Doctorine Dark (talk) 13:10, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Too common to be featured here and was used for 16 years in a good number of films (including a few non-Disney films such as Ponyo and The Ice Age Adventures of Buck Wild (was originally a Fox movie before the big merge of 2019) to name a few). --Snorunt (talk) 02:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose this logo is like the exact opposite of rare. i've torrented two movies with this logo (the wreck-it ralph movies btw) so this is not getting featured (The Third Place) 04:31, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I know that I like this logo, but this isn't rare or interesting for this nominations. I know it's iconic, but not THAT much. It doesn't need to be featured. User:Luli Logo (Talk January 8, 2023 14:20 (UTC)
Oppose Really easy to find; sorry for your request, but make sure if you find a logo that almost nobody cannot find, then it would be perfect. (Talk/Edits) 15:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose since Happy became the new McDonald's mascot. This is a thing for extremely rare stuff, not extremely common stuff. Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 17:33, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Per everyone else. · Talk · Edits 17:10, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
- Closing as {rejected
. Logohub (talk) 11:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)}}
Touchstone Home Video (1989).jpg
.jpg)
Reason: It's just that versions of famous logos with altered looks fascinate me. It looks really different compared to the movie logo (I know it's a home video logo, so it's not supposed to look exactly like the movie logo). Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 15:12, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Support
Oppose
Oppose Not rare or significant. SnowflakesOmega (talk) 23:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- It is pretty rare, since it only lasted a year before being replaced (it was around a bit longer here in the UK, though.) Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 13:19, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
File:TAT1979.png
_(Credit_-_Logo_Central_and_SamBonzi).png){kind=logo}
Reason: A very rare logo thats very famous.
Support
- Support Logohub (talk) 17:33, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support (The Third Place) 18:44, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support This was featured in the original Wikifoundry CLG back in the day, and considering other WF features were re-featured, I don't see why this can't. VPJHuk (talk) 19:28, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Solely because it's one of the rarest finds we've had. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 19:58, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Since this was featured on the old Wikifoundry site, it's a no-brainer. Dominicmgm (talk) 11:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Even though we got only one find that was 4 or 5 years ago, it is still pretty intresting. (• USER TALK! •) 02:56, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support It isn't already?! AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 19:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Per everyone else. (Talk/Edits) 15:48, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Will we ever find this? (probably not).
- Support · Talk · Edits 17:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
- Oppose, How are we supposed to know if it's good if it hasn't been found yet? VinegarPop (talk) 17:19, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose This is a screenshot from Broken Saw's video. If it wasn't from the 1980 rerun, I would support. (• USER TALK! •) 17:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
30th Television (2011).jpg
.jpg)
Support
- Support Talk · Edits 11:37, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Logohub (talk) 11:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Compooper (talk) 11:41, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Whenever we find something like this or a new logo is launched it should be immediately considered for featuring. (name change coming soon) 11:43, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support (• USER TALK! •) 13:52, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support (Discussion area ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 14:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support VinegarPop (talk) 17:25, January 6, 2023 (UTC)
- Support · Talk · Edits 22:41, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support Supreme Raridade lol Thesquidgeeks (talk) 8:28, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support (Talk/Edits) 15:48, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
- Oppose All it is is just the normal 20th Television logo with a 3 instead of a 2. Sonictailsknucklesshadow (talk) 16:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- While the appeal isn't the most satisfying one, the real reason I posted it was due to it's rarity as well as it probably interesting a couple others. This is also a way better version of the 30th Television logo than the one we got in syndication. You can see that one here. Shame it wasn't used in the actual show. VPJHuk (talk) 16:50, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Lmao tell it to 30th Century Fox TV. This find is neat (• USER TALK! •) 18:49, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- "Sonictailsknucklesshadow" Dios mio, you've unlocked them all! (The Third Place) 01:00, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Comments
first nomination ever
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Bell System (1941).png & others
-
1941
-
1960
-
1964
-
1966
-
1968
-
1968
-
1983
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
Reasons:
- The 1941 Bell System logo was found on Telephone History: "Long Distance", which in turn can be found here.
- The 1983 Bell System logo was found on a March 1, 1983 airing of The MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour. I actually expected the 2nd AT&T logo to be there, but I guess I got a surprise. This can be found here.
- The rest was found on a Bell System/AT&T logo history video. They are all seen here.
Support
Support (The Third Place) 12:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
- Oppose, In what situation would anyone vote for these? VinegarPop (talk) 17:27, January 6, 2023 (UTC)
- Idk. Thought they were rare enough to be posted here. I don't blame you. Doctorine Dark (talk) 17:35, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
_(Spanish).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(From_-_The_Who_Rocks_America).png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(From_-_Polish_Magila_Gorila_VHS).png){kind=link}
.jpg_and_File:Jerry_Bruckheimer_Films_(Kangaroo_Jack,_Theatrical_B).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
